Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
Towards the end of the last century, again with the aid of
liberalism, laws against the socialists were drawn up. After they
had been passed war was waged against socialistic literature. In
the year 1886 there appeared a real Index Librorum Prohibitorum,
its title read, “Social Democratic publications and societies
prohibited by the imperial law against the dangerous designs of
Social Democracy,” which law had then been in force eight years. A
supplementary list was published two years later, in 1888.
_Hilgers_ makes this comment on it: “How many additional pamphlets
have been condemned in the time from March 28, 1888, to September
30, 1890, we cannot state.” According to the foregoing official
statement the average is 130 a year. Hence we assume that the
printed matter prohibited during the twelve years that the law was
in force amounted to between 15,000 and 16,000. This number of
social democratic pamphlets forbidden within twelve years exceeds
by far the number of all books prohibited by the Roman Index in
the course of the entire nineteenth century—books that are the
products of all countries in the world and dealing with all
branches; the number of these German prohibitions is ten times
that of Roman prohibitions. Indeed, in the course of a year and a
half the new German Empire prohibited more writings of Germans
than Rome had prohibited during the entire past century. We may
mention here _Goethe_. In the atheism dispute, at the end of the
eighteenth century, decision was rendered upon _Goethe’s_ advice
against the philosopher _Fichte_; _Fichte_ was discharged in spite
of petitions and mediations in his favour. The liberal Grand Duke
_Karl August of Saxony Weimar_ granted in 1816, after the French
conqueror had been overthrown, freedom of the press. Professor
_Oken_ of Jena availed himself of this privilege, and printed in
his “Isis” contributions complaining about the government.
_Goethe_ had to advise what should be done against it. He thought
that the paper should have been suppressed by the police at its
very first announcement; “the measure neglected at the beginning
is to be taken immediately and the paper is to be prohibited. By
prohibiting the ‘Isis’ the trouble will be stopped at once”
(Briefwechsel des Grossh. _Karl August v. Sax.-Weimar-Eisenach_
mit _Goethe_, II, 1863, 90). And this was done, in spite of the
freedom granted the press.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account