Free thought; Modernism (Christian theology) -- Catholic Church; Religion and science; Teaching, Freedom of
To many even the _existence of Jesus_ has become doubtful; and
this not only to men of an irreligious propaganda, like Prof. _A.
Drews_, who, carried away by the corroding tendency of a radical
age, journeyed from town to town in order to proclaim, in the
twentieth century of Christian reckoning, the scientific discovery
of the “Myth of Christ”; but even to others the existence of Jesus
has become doubtful or at least valueless. The task now is to do
away entirely with the person of Jesus, and to solve the problem
of preserving a Christian faith without a Christ. In this sense
Prof. _M. Rade_ writes: “Serious and gifted men having asserted
that Jesus never existed (or, what amounts to the same, that, if
He ever lived, nothing is known of Him; hence, His existence is of
no historical importance), we dogmatists almost have to be
grateful to them for having helped us to put a very concrete
question no longer in general terms: how does religious certainty
face historical criticism? but quite specifically: how does
religious certainty (of the Christian) regard the
historic-scientific possibility of the non-existence of the
historical Jesus?” They frankly assert that they could entirely
forego the person of Christ. Thus Prof. _P. W. Schmiedel_
declares: “My innermost religious conviction would not suffer
injury were I to be convinced to-day that Jesus never lived.... I
would know that I could not lose the measure of piety that has
become my property long since, even if I cannot derive it any
longer from Jesus.” “Neither does my piety require me to see in
Jesus an absolutely perfect type, nor would it disturb me were I
to find someone else actually surpassing Him, which undoubtedly is
the case in some respects.” For him to whom Christ is no longer
God but a man and capable of error, His person and existence have
necessarily lost their value.
Thus we have arrived at a _Christianity without a Christ_. As yet the
person of the Lord is usually surrounded by a halo: it is the after-effect
of a faithful past, the last rays of a setting sun. That this last
glimmer, too, will pale and give way to darkness is but a question of
time, when with more honesty expression will be given to the conclusion
necessarily arrived at. If Christ is not what He claimed to be, God and
Messiah, then the belief in His being the Son of God and the Messiah, in
His right to abrogate the religion of the Old Testament and to found a new
religion, commanding its acceptance under penalty of damnation—all this
can be nothing but the result of religious fanaticism and mental
derangement. And science is, in all seriousness, preparing to turn into
this direction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account