Ista autem et Thomae et Concili Toletani et Gregori et Theologorum, Canonistarum, Iurisprudentiumque fere omnium conclusio est:[40a] Quantumcumque fides annuntiata sit Barbaris (nam de his qui subditi ante fuerunt Christianis Principibus item de Apostatis alia est quaestio) probabiliter et sufficienter, et si noluerint eam respicere, non tamen licere hac ratione eos bello persequi, et spoliare bonis suis.[41a] Operae pretium est in hanc rem ipsa Caietani verba describere:[42a] ‘Quidam’, ait, ‘infideles nec de iure nec de facto subsunt secundum temporalem iurisdictionem Principibus Christianis, ut inveniuntur pagani, qui numquam imperio Romano subditi fuerunt, terras habitantes, in quibus Christianum numquam fuit nomen. Horum namque domini, quamvis infideles, legitimi domini sunt, sive regali sive politico regimine gubernantur; nec sunt propter infidelitatem a dominio suorum privati, cum dominium sit - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - grounds of complaint. Nor is there any better justification for the other pretext than the one alleged by the Greeks against the barbarians, to which Boëthius makes the following allusion: “_Unjust and cruel wars they wage, And haste with flying darts the death to meet or deal. No right nor reason can they show; ’Tis but because their lands and laws are not the same._”[39] Moreover the verdict of Thomas Aquinas, of the Council of Toledo, of Gregory, and of nearly all theologians, canonists, and jurists, is as follows:[40] However persuasively and sufficiently the True Faith has been preached to the heathen--former subjects of Christian princes or apostates are quite another question--if they are unwilling to heed it, that is not sufficient cause to justify war upon them, or to despoil them of their goods.[41] It is worth while on this point to quote the actual words of Cajetan:[42] ‘There are some infidels who are neither in law nor in fact under the temporal jurisdiction of Christian princes; just as there were pagans who were never, subjects of the Roman Empire, and yet who inhabit lands where the name of Christ was never heard. Now their rulers, though heathen, are legitimate rulers, whether the people live under a monarchical or a democratic régime. They are not to be deprived of sovereignty over their possessions - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -