The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian tradeGrotius, Hugo
Philosophy
The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian trade
Grotius, Hugo
Freedom of the seas; Law of the sea
There is not therefore the least reason for surprise that the Roman
people through their emperors or praetors were able to grant to its
subjects the right of occupying the shore. This public occupation,
however, no less than private occupation, was subject to the
restriction that it should not infringe on international rights.
Therefore the Roman people could not forbid any one from having
access to the seashore,[76] and from spreading his fishing nets there
to dry, and from doing other things which all men long ago decided
were always permissible.
The nature of the sea, however, differs from that of the shore,
because the sea, except for a very restricted space, can neither
easily be built upon, nor inclosed; if the contrary were true yet
this could hardly happen without hindrance to the general use.
Nevertheless, if any small portion of the sea can be thus occupied,
the occupation is recognized. The famous hyperbole of Horace must be
quoted here: “The fishes note the narrowing of the waters by piers of
rock laid in their depths.”[77]
Now Celsus holds that piles driven into the sea belong to the man
who drove them.[78] But such an act is not permissible if the use
of the sea be thereby impaired. And Ulpian says that whoever builds
a breakwater must be protected if it is not prejudicial to the
interests of any one; for if this construction is likely to work an
injury to any one, the injunction ‘Nothing may be built on public
property’ would apply. Labeo, however, holds that in case any such
construction should be made in the sea, the following injunction
is to be enforced: ‘Nothing may be built in the sea whereby the
harbor, the roadstead, or the channel be rendered less safe for
navigation’.[79]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quae autem navigationis eadem piscatus habenda est ratio, ut communis
maneat omnibus. Neque tamen peccabit si quis in maris diverticulo
piscandi locum sibi palis circumsepiat, atque ita privatum faciat;
sicut Lucullus exciso apud Neapolim monte ad villam suam maria
admisit.[80a] Et huius generis, puto fuisse piscinas maritimas quarum
Varro et Columella meminerunt. Nec Martialis alio spectavit, cum de
Formiano Apollinaris loquitur:[81a]
_Si quando NEREVS sentit Aeoli regnum,
Ridet procellas tuta de SVO mensa._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account