The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian tradeGrotius, Hugo
Philosophy
The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian trade
Grotius, Hugo
Freedom of the seas; Law of the sea
Nevertheless, even those who lay burdens upon foreigners, or
appropriate things common to all, rely upon a possession which is
to some extent real. For since original occupation created private
property, therefore detention of a thing, though unjust, gives an
appearance of ownership. But have the Portuguese completely covered
the ocean, as we are wont to do on land, by laying out estates on
it in such a way that they have the right to exclude from that
ocean whom they will? Not at all! On the contrary, they are so far
from having done so, that when they divide up the world to the
disadvantage of other nations, they cannot even defend their action
by showing any boundaries either natural or artificial, but are
compelled to fall back upon some imaginary line. Indeed, if that
were a recognized method, and such a delimitation of boundaries were
sufficient to make possession valid, our geometers long since would
have got possession of the face of the earth, our astronomers of the
very skies.
But where in this case is that corporal possession or physical
appropriation, without which no ownerships arise? There appears to
be nothing truer than what our learned jurists have enunciated,
namely,[102] that since the sea is just as insusceptible of physical
appropriation as the air, it cannot be attached to the possessions of
any nation.
But if the Portuguese call _occupying_ the sea merely to have sailed
over it before other people, and to have, as it were, opened the way,
could anything in the world be more ridiculous? For, as there is no
part of the sea on which some person has not already sailed, it will
necessarily follow that every route of navigation is occupied by some
one. Therefore we peoples of today are all absolutely excluded. Why
will not those men who have circumnavigated the globe be justified in
saying that they have acquired for themselves the possession of the
whole ocean! But there
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
navem per mare transeuntem non plus iuris, quam vestigii relinquere.
Verum etiam quod sibi sumunt neminem ante ipsos eum Oceanum
navigasse, id minime verum est. Magna enim pars eius de quo agitur
maris, ambitu Mauritaniae, iam olim navigata est; ulterior et in
orientem vergens victoriis Magni Alexandri lustrata est, usque in
Arabicum sinum.[103a]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account