The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian trade — John Shaqi
The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian tradeGrotius, Hugo
Philosophy
The freedom of the seas : $b or, The right which belongs to the Dutch to take part in the East Indian trade
Grotius, Hugo
Freedom of the seas; Law of the sea
* [Strictly speaking, Gaius was the grandson of Augustus, but was
adopted as his son.]
Pliny’s description of the route to the East,[104] the embassies
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Augustum, ad Claudium etiam ex Taprobane insula, deinde gesta Traiani
et tabulae Ptolemaei satis ostendunt. Iam suo tempore Strabo[105a]
Alexandrinorum mercatorum classem ex Arabico sinu, ut Aethiopiae
ultima, ita et Indiae, petiisse testatur, cum olim paucis navibus id
auderetur. Inde magna populo Romano vectigalia; addit Plinius[106a]
impositis sagittariorum cohortibus piratarum metu navigatum; solamque
Indiam quingenties sestertium, si Arabiam addas et Seres, millies
annis omnibus Romano Imperio ademisse; et merces centuplicato
venditas.
Et haec quidem vetera satis arguunt primos non fuisse Lusitanos. In
singulis autem sui partibus Oceanus ille et tunc cum eum Lusitani
ingressi sunt, et numquam non cognitus fuit. Mauri enim, Aethiopes,
Arabes, Persae, Indi, eam maris partem cuius ipsi accolae sunt,
nescire neutiquam potuerunt.
Mentiuntur ergo qui se mare illud invenisse iactant.
Quid igitur, dicet aliquis, parumne videtur, quod Lusitani
intermissam multis forte saeculis navigationem primi repararunt, et,
quod negari non potest, Europaeis gentibus ignotam ostenderunt, magno
suo labore, sumptu, periculo?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
from the Indies to Augustus, and those from Ceylon to the emperor
Claudius, and finally the accounts of the deeds of Trajan, and the
writings of Ptolemaeus, all make it quite clear that in the days
of Rome’s greatest splendor voyages were made regularly from the
Arabian gulf to India, to the islands of the Indian ocean, and even
so far as to the golden Chersonesus, which many people think was
Japan. Strabo says[105] that in his own time a fleet of Alexandrian
merchantmen set sail from the Arabian gulf for the distant lands of
Ethiopia and India, although few ships had ever before attempted that
voyage. The Roman people had a large revenue from the East. Pliny
says[106] that cohorts of archers were carried on the boats engaged
in trade as protection against pirates; he states also that every
year 500,000 sesterces* were taken out of the Roman empire by India
alone, or 1,000,000 sesterces if you add Arabia and China; further,
that merchandise brought from the East sold for one hundred times its
original cost.
* [A Roman sestertius was about four cents.]
These examples cited from ancient times are sufficient proof that
the Portuguese were not the first in that part of the world. Long
before they ever came, every single part of that ocean had been long
since explored. For how possibly could the Moors, the Ethiopians,
the Arabians, the Persians, the peoples of India, have remained in
ignorance of that part of the sea adjacent to their coasts!
Therefore they lie, who today boast that they discovered that sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account