France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
What to do with the Finance? This indeed is the great question: a
small but most black weather-symptom, which no radiance of
universal hope can cover. We saw Turgot cast forth from the
Controllership, with shrieks,—for want of a Fortunatus’ Purse. As
little could M. de Clugny manage the duty; or indeed do anything,
but consume his wages; attain “a place in History,” where as an
ineffectual shadow thou beholdest him still lingering;—and let
the duty manage itself. Did Genevese Necker _possess_ such a
Purse, then? He possessed banker’s skill, banker’s honesty;
_credit_ of all kinds, for he had written Academic Prize Essays,
struggled for India Companies, given dinners to Philosophes, and
“realised a fortune in twenty years.” He possessed, further, a
taciturnity and solemnity; of depth, or else of dulness. How
singular for Celadon Gibbon, false swain as he had proved; whose
father, keeping most probably his own gig, “would not hear of
such a union,”—to find now his forsaken Demoiselle Curchod
sitting in the high places of the world, as Minister’s Madame,
and “Necker not jealous!”[40]
A new young Demoiselle, one day to be famed as a Madame and De
Staël, was romping about the knees of the Decline and Fall: the
lady Necker founds Hospitals; gives solemn Philosophe
dinner-parties, to cheer her exhausted Controller-General.
Strange things have happened: by clamour of Philosophism,
management of Marquis de Pezay, and Poverty constraining even
Kings. And so Necker, Atlas-like, sustains the burden of the
Finances, for five years long?[41] Without wages, for he refused
such; cheered only by Public Opinion, and the ministering of his
noble Wife. With many thoughts in him, it is hoped;—which,
however, he is shy of uttering. His _Compte Rendu_, published by
the royal permission, fresh sign of a New Era, shows
wonders;—which what but the genius of some Atlas-Necker can
prevent from becoming portents? In Necker’s head too there is a
whole pacific French Revolution, of its kind; and in that
taciturn dull depth, or deep dulness, ambition enough.
Meanwhile, alas, his Fotunatus’ Purse turns out to be little
other than the old “_vectigal_ of Parsimony.” Nay, he too has to
produce his scheme of taxing: Clergy, Noblesse to be taxed;
Provincial Assemblies, and the rest,—like a mere Turgot! The
expiring M. de Maurepas must gyrate one other time. Let Necker
also depart; not unlamented.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account