France -- History -- Louis XVI, 1774-1793; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799
The Notables, mollified by Easter festivities, by the sacrifice
of Calonne, are not in the worst humour. Already his Majesty,
while the “interlunar shadows” were in office, had held session
of Notables; and from his throne delivered promissory
conciliatory eloquence: “The Queen stood waiting at a window,
till his carriage came back; and Monsieur from afar clapped hands
to her,” in sign that all was well.[64] It has had the best
effect; if such do but last. Leading Notables meanwhile can be
“caressed;” Brienne’s new gloss, Lamoignon’s long head will
profit somewhat; conciliatory eloquence shall not be wanting. On
the whole, however, is it not undeniable that this of ousting
Calonne and adopting the plans of Calonne, is a measure which, to
produce its best effect, should be looked at from a certain
distance, cursorily; not dwelt on with minute near scrutiny. In a
word, that no service the Notables could now do were so obliging
as, in some handsome manner, to—take themselves away! Their “Six
Propositions” about Provisional Assemblies, suppression of
_Corvées_ and suchlike, can be accepted without criticism. The
_Subvention_ on Land-tax, and much else, one must glide hastily
over; safe nowhere but in flourishes of conciliatory eloquence.
Till at length, on this 25th of May, year 1787, in solemn final
session, there bursts forth what we can call an explosion of
eloquence; King, Loménie, Lamoignon and retinue taking up the
successive strain; in harrangues to the number of ten, besides
his Majesty’s, which last the livelong day;—whereby, as in a kind
of choral anthem, or bravura peal, of thanks, praises, promises,
the Notables are, so to speak, organed out, and dismissed to
their respective places of abode. They had sat, and talked, some
nine weeks: they were the first Notables since Richelieu’s, in
the year 1626.
By some Historians, sitting much at their ease, in the safe
distance, Loménie has been blamed for this dismissal of his
Notables: nevertheless it was clearly time. There are things, as
we said, which should not be dwelt on with minute close scrutiny:
over hot coals you cannot glide too fast. In these Seven Bureaus,
where no work could be done, unless talk were work, the
questionablest matters were coming up. Lafayette, for example, in
Monseigneur d’Artois’ Bureau, took upon him to set forth more
than one deprecatory oration about _Lettres-de-Cachet_, Liberty
of the Subject, _Agio_, and suchlike; which Monseigneur
endeavouring to repress, was answered that a Notable being
summoned to speak his opinion must speak it.[65]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account