The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in EuropeDominian, Leon
History
The Frontiers of Language and Nationality in Europe
Dominian, Leon
Europe -- Languages; Nationalism
FIG. 34--Sketch map of Schleswig-Holstein showing languages
spoken. According to the German viewpoint. Scale, 1:1,200,000.
(Based on maps on pp. 59, 60, Andree’s Handatlas, 6th ed.)]
At present the problem of Schleswig is considered settled by the
German government. A treaty signed on January 11, 1907, between
the cabinets of Berlin and Copenhagen defined the status of the
inhabitants of the annexed duchy. The problem of the “Heimatlose”
or citizens without a country[77] was solved by the recognition
of the right of choice of nationality on their part. The German
government considered this measure as satisfying the aspirations
of its subjects of Danish birth. Nevertheless, although the Danish
government appeared to share these views, the acquiescence of
Danes living in Germany to any solution other than the restoration
to Denmark of the Danish-speaking sections of Schleswig remains
doubtful. That suspicion of the loyalty of the Schleswig Danes is
still entertained in Germany is shown by statements like that made
by Henry Goddard Leach, Secretary of the American-Scandinavian
Foundation, when he asserted[78] that Roald Amundsen, discoverer of
the South Pole, was prevented from lecturing in Norwegian, in the
town of Flensborg, because the language resembled Danish.
[Illustration:
FIG. 35--Sketch map of Schleswig-Holstein showing languages
spoken. According to the Danish viewpoint. Scale, 1:1,200,000.
(After Rosendal based on Clausens and Heyers.)]
In Norway the linguistic problem goes under the name of Maalstraev.
The question of language in that country was debated with marked
fervor[79] during the years prior to the separation from Sweden.
“Freedom with self-government, home, land and our own language”
was the plea of Mr. Jörgen Lövland, subsequently Premier of Norway,
in an address to the Norwegian youth in 1904. “Political freedom,”
then said Mr. Lövland, “is not the deepest and greatest. Greater
is it for a nation to preserve her intellectual inheritance in her
native tongue.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account