The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to The Great IllusionAngell, Norman
History
The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to The Great Illusion
Angell, Norman
Economic history -- 1918-1945; World War, 1914-1918 -- Influence
With a public debt of 233,729 million of francs (about £9,300,000,000,
at the pre-war rate of exchange); with the permanent problem of a
declining population accentuated by the loss of millions of men killed
and wounded in the war, and complicated by the importation of coloured
labour; with the exchange value of the franc reduced to sixty in terms
of the British pound, and to fifteen in terms of the American
dollar,[127] the position of victorious France in the hour of her
complete military predominance over Europe seems wellnigh desperate.
She could of course secure very considerable alleviation of her present
difficulties if she would consent to the only condition upon which
Germany could make a considerable contribution to Reparations; the
restoration of German industry. But to that one indispensable condition
of indemnity or reparation France will not consent, because the French
feel that a flourishing Germany would be a Germany dangerous to the
security of France.
In this condition one may recall a part of _The Great Illusion_ case
which, more than any other of the 'preposterous propositions,' excited
derision and scepticism before the War. That was the part dealing with
the difficulties of securing an indemnity. In a chapter (of the early
1910 Edition) entitled _The Indemnity Futility_, occurred these
passages:--
'The difficulty in the case of a large indemnity is not so much the
payment by the vanquished as the receiving by the victor ...
'When a nation receives an indemnity of a large amount of gold, one
or two things happens: either the money is exchanged for real
wealth with other nations, in which case the greatly increased
imports compete directly with the home producers, or the money is
kept within the frontiers and is not exchanged for real wealth from
abroad, and prices inevitably rise.... The rise in price of home
commodities hampers the nation receiving the indemnity in selling
those commodities in the neutral markets of the world, especially
as the loss of so large a sum by the vanquished nation has just the
reverse effect of cheapening prices and therefore, enabling that
nation to compete on better terms with the conqueror in neutral
markets.'--(p. 76.)
The effect of the payment of the French indemnity of 1872 upon German
industry was analysed at length.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account