The Fundamentals of BacteriologyMorrey, Charles Bradfield
Science
The Fundamentals of Bacteriology
Morrey, Charles Bradfield
Bacteriology
An important part of the scientific knowledge of living organisms is
dependent on a study of their forms and relationships. As has been
stated, Leeuwenhoek considered bacteria to be “animalcules” because
they showed independent movement. But little attention was paid to
the natural history of these animalcules for nearly a hundred years
after Leeuwenhoek. During the last quarter of the eighteenth century,
however, workers busied themselves chiefly with the discovery and
description of new forms. Among these students were Baron Gleichen,
Jablot, Lesser, Reaumur, Hill and others. Müller, of Copenhagen, in
1786 published the first attempt at classification, a most important
step in the study of these organisms. Müller introduced the terms
Monas, Proteus and Vibrio, which are still in use. Ehrenberg, in his
work on _Infusoria_, or the organisms found in infusions, published
in 1838, introduced many generic names in use at present, but still
classed the bacteria with protozoa. Joseph Leidy, the American
naturalist, considered that the “vibrios” of previous writers were
plants and not “animalcules.” He seems to have been the first to have
made this distinction (1849). Perty (1852) recognized the presence of
spores in some of his organisms. Ferdinand Cohn (1854) classed the
bacteria among plants. Nägeli (1857) proposed the name “Schizomycetes”
or “fission fungi,” which is still retained for the entire class of
bacteria. Cohn in the years 1872-1875 established classification on
a modern basis and added greatly to the knowledge of morphology and
natural history of bacteria. He described spore formation and the
development of spores into active bacteria, and showed the close
relationships as well as differences between the bacteria and the lower
algæ. Robert Koch was a pupil of Cohn.
An examination of the accompanying chronological table will show how
the investigations and discoveries in connection with “spontaneous
generation,” the “contagium vivum” theory and putrefaction and
fermentation must have been mutually suggestive:
1546. Fracastorius, disease germs theory and direct and indirect
contagion.
1671. Kircher, “contagium vivum” theory.
1675. Leeuwenhoek, first saw bacteria, “animalcules.”
1701. Andry, “animalcules” cause of diseases.
1718. Lancisi, “animalcules” cause of malaria.
1749. Needham, described development of organisms in water around
barley grains.
1762. Plenciz, arguments for “living cause” theory and that
“animalcules” cause putrefaction.
1768. Bonnet, suggested that probably Needham’s organisms came from
germs in the liquid.
1776. Spallanzani, boiled and sealed infusions.
1786. Müller, first classified “animalcules.”
1787. Wollstein, glanders pus infectious.
1795-1798. Jenner, vaccination against smallpox.
1797. Viborg, transmitted glanders repeatedly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account