As long as Mohammed lived, this state of things remained unquestioned,
and difficulties began only at his death. It is a point which has been
much disputed what were the prophet's intentions regarding this event.
In early times the sect of Ali maintained that he had appointed his
son-in-law his heir, and others have held that Abu Bekr had the
nomination; but Sunites are now mostly agreed that no individual
appointment was made, and that the choice of a successor was left to be
decided by election. In any case the procedure followed by Mohammed's
bereaved followers was elective, and its details were in strict
accordance with that Arabian custom on which the Koranic law is mainly
built.
Now, in an Arab tribe, when the Sheykh dies, the elders of the tribe,
heads of its great houses and sections, assemble in one of their
number's tent and, sitting in a circle, discuss the subject of his
succession. Theoretically, the choice of a successor is open to any one
of them, for the tribe, however large, is all one great family,
descended from a common ancestor, and though no one from without could
be admitted to the supreme rule, any one from within the tribe can hold
office. But in practice the choice is limited to a few persons. The
reverence of the Arabs for blood, and for selected strains of blood,
prevent them, except in very exceptional cases, from changing the
dynasty of their rulers. If the dead man has left behind him a son of
full age and respectable qualities, he will, without dispute, be
acknowledged Sheykh. If not, an uncle, a nephew, or a cousin will be
chosen. Only in extreme circumstances of general danger, or of failure
of heirs male, can the member of a new family reasonably aspire to
power. Moreover, there is no uniform law of election. The meeting does
not pretend to give a right, only to confirm one; for the right lies not
with the electors but with him who can maintain his election. There is,
therefore, no formal system of voting, but the elders having ascertained
who among the dead man's relations commands the strongest following,
proceed to acknowledge him by the ceremony of giving him their hands. He
then becomes their Sheykh. It sometimes happens, however, that parties
are so evenly divided between rival leaders that the tribe divides, one
section going this way and the other that, until one of the leaders
gives in his submission; otherwise the quarrel is decided by the sword.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account