The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"Figgis, Darrell
History
The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"
Figgis, Darrell
Ireland -- Politics and government; Irish question
In the same dispute another fault of the State was involved--in fact,
was one of the causes that led to the invasion of the foreigner. For
the dynastic war was really the struggle of the provinces for the
hegemony. The O’Neills of Meath and Ulster, the O’Conors of Connacht
and the O’Briens of Munster contended together in the names of their
provinces; and the Mac Murchadhas of Leinster, having no part in the
war, were driven into a false isolation. This was only possible because
the provinces had interposed an authority between the executive of
the State and the stateships that had no real function. They could
materially hinder, and could not materially help, the smooth working
of the State. Had the provincial or territorial courts not existed
the result would have been as deft a balance between a centralised
and decentralised State as can well be imagined. The interposition
of the provincial courts reduced the central authority almost to a
futility except when a masterful personality held the monarchy. They
broke the balance between the centre and parts of the whole, and in
the result snapped the connection that existed between them. The only
real link they needed they possessed in the Councils that met under the
presidency of the Monarch in national assembly to adjust and continue
the government of the country: the Council of Brehons, the Council of
Rulers, the Council of Historians, and so forth. Each Council decided
its own affairs, and the Monarch and his higher officials held the
whole in co-ordination. That was a real and a vital connection. No
other was needed. The provincial courts could only--possessing as they
did, for the most part, powers almost equal to the monarchy--break that
connection, and so disturb the balance of the whole. They did so in
the outcome of things, occupying the place that they did; and they did
so deliberately, creating local loyalties in order to increase their
power. They were, and could not help but be, a disruptive element in
the State.
Undoubtedly the dynastic war of the eleventh century, pressed to its
logical consummation, would have ended this false value. The dynastic
war of the first centuries between Connacht and Ulster had ended in the
elimination of Ulster as a rival; and, however the later war would have
ended, a strong central authority must eventually have emerged and the
provincial kingships have been reduced to a merely nominal position in
the economy of the State, without possessing the power to dispute the
monarchy or its executive hold on the Nation. This in its turn would
have required a national army; and would have answered another defect.
For when in the fifth century Ireland disbanded her national militia,
the Fianna Eireann, she lay a prey to any invader at a time when armies
had become national necessities.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account