The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"Figgis, Darrell
History
The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"
Figgis, Darrell
Ireland -- Politics and government; Irish question
Such were the attempts, made too late, to restore the State and eject
the invader. One was dependent on the other. It was clearly impossible
to restore the State until the invader had first been cast out. His
presence in the country necessarily acted like an obstruction in the
blood, and made it impossible for the body of the State to resume its
health and perfect its functions until the poison had been expelled.
This was so in the natural law of things; but, in addition to this
natural and inevitable result, the invaders, in order to maintain
their position in the country, set to work to create division between
the scattered portions of the broken State. That was easy to do.
The leaders in the different parts of the country have been blamed
(by none more than by their nation) for serving their own sectional
interests instead of the national unity. But how were they to discover
the national unity, and how were they to distinguish, as we now can
distinguish, between sectional and national interests? The history of
mankind proves that in a broken State it is a simple task to create
discord, and a giant’s task to create unity. The invaders acted at
first from a common centre; and the nature of the case robbed the Irish
Nation of any common centre from which to act. That was the first
difficulty. Secondly, there are always men in every Nation who are
willing to sell their honour. So long as Nations can repel invasion
that fact does not become an active danger within the security of its
State; but directly an invader enters a country, with gold and honours
in his gift, it becomes almost impossible to overtake the poison that
runs in every direction. Men grow suspicious of the most honest purpose
if that purpose is not at once apparent; and if it is at once apparent
it is thereby at once revealed to the enemy. Finally, most men are
near-sighted; they judge of large issues by their immediate effects,
and so mistake those immediate effects for the large issues, making it
easy for an enemy to drive divisions in between sectional interests.
These things are so, not necessarily because men are corrupt, but by
the nature of things; and their combined result was the broken State of
Ireland.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account