The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"Figgis, Darrell
History
The Gaelic State in the past & future : $b or, "The crown of a nation"
Figgis, Darrell
Ireland -- Politics and government; Irish question
When in 1598 the Earl of Essex was sent against him he met him in
parley and made him an offer to bear to Elizabeth. Whether that offer
was sincerely made, or only put out to save time, does not matter here;
but it contained one article that is very significant. It runs thus:
“That all nations in Ireland shall enjoy their living as they did two
hundred years ago.” Now it is clear that he uses the word “nations”
in some special sense--that he is, in fact, rendering some word from
Irish. Nor is it difficult to discover what that word is. He can only
be referring to the _tuatha_, or stateships, on which the State was
based that was now threatened with extinction; and his demand was that
they should remain intact and unmolested as they had been “two hundred
years ago,” when England was busy with civil war. The demand was
rejected. He could hardly have expected anything else. And when he was
finally defeated five years afterwards, those “nations,” or stateships,
were doomed to a final and terrible ruin.
VI. THE RESURRECTION FROM THE DEAD.
The horror of the Plantations and Confiscations was not due simply to
the land-avarice of a conqueror. In some measure they sprang from that
simple and immediate lust, but really they arose from a much remoter
necessity. They were logically inevitable from the invader’s point of
view. The war of State against State, from that point of view, was
always finally helpless because the Irish State, dismembered though
it was, took strangers coming into the country and enveloped them in
its own polity. And it was indestructible so long as it was based on
the free ownership of land. Therefore to destroy the State it was
necessary to root it out of the land; and as the State was composed of
the people, and could not be composed otherwise, it was necessary to
root them out of the land. What happened to them afterwards was but
an incident in the campaign. They were to be replaced by a new set
of proprietors who would come with the intuitions and desires of the
foreign State, and who would be provided with very good reasons to see
that the new shire-land with themselves as lords thereof did not revert
to stateships in the possession of the people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account