But the testamentary aim of the richest trio that ever lived in America
was to escape this national trait of beneficence; to substitute the
perpetuity of one's business monopoly or family trade; to struggle
against any serious division of the enormous fortune, even at the cost
of preferences among equal children; to spare not one dollar out of
fifty millions for the public; to heap the gigantic hoard, save what for
other legatees propriety demands, on some "chip of the old block" or
business "bird of a feather." This purpose also influenced their lives.
"Magnificence is the decency of the rich," but little magnificence
marked the lives of those three rich New Yorkers. Powerful, self-willed,
all-conquering they were, but hardly magnificent. Unprecedented and
incredible thing in America, neither Stewart nor Vanderbilt left one
poor dollar of his fifty or sixty millions to any municipal or
charitable purpose. Filled with his posthumous business plans, neither
cared for New York as Girard cared for Philadelphia and Hopkins for
Baltimore. True, each of the Gotham triumvirate endowed in life an
institution of public beneficence--Astor his library, Vanderbilt his
college away in Tennessee, Stewart his hotel for women. It is further
true that men who, like Vanderbilt and Stewart, give sure pay for many
years to thousands of employees, are benefactors. But to do this, and
then to leave besides some testamentary memorial to the city where one
has heaped up his wealth, has hitherto been the aim of the rich men of
America. Girard not only founded his orphan college, ornament and pride
of Philadelphia, but left great sums to beautify and improve the city by
removing wooden houses and widening thoroughfares. Stewart, scrupulously
just in business dealings, deserves public gratitude as the apostle of
"one price," and as the cash-selling reformer who protected prudent folk
from the higher prices caused in trade by the allowances for bad debts;
but, this apart, in the will of Stewart and the will of Stephen Girard,
what a world-wide difference of public spirit! That one act of grace
that might have tempered his forgetfulness toward New York--the gift of
his picture gallery for public uses--even this act Stewart did not do.
The contrast is startling between the bequests of an Astor, a Stewart, a
Vanderbilt, and those of a Girard, a Peabody, and a Johns Hopkins.
THE DUEL AND THE NEWSPAPERS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account