The Galaxy, May, 1877: Vol. XXIII.—May, 1877.—No. 5.Various
General
The Galaxy, May, 1877: Vol. XXIII.—May, 1877.—No. 5.
Various
American literature -- Periodicals
We missed them on the Batavier, which wasn't strange, and first had our
attention drawn to them by the slow Dutch landlord's asking Ronayne, as
we stood looking idly out into the formal little garden of the new Bath
hotel at Rotterdam, if that was _his_ baby a young woman seated on one
of the garden benches was jerking up and down so violently? "Because it
was shaken about too much. Young babies couldn't be kept too quiet."
This young woman was the benevolent friend, and I suppose the parents
were off sight-seeing in the town; for every now and then the whole day
through one or another of us reported encountering the young woman
alone somewhere, always tossing the baby more or less about.
But next day, after we had embarked on the Rhine boat, and I had helped
nurse turn our tiny state-room into a tolerable nursery (that folding
bassinnette is just _invaluable_, and lulled by the motion and the
breezy air, my lammie slept better in it than in her own quarters at
home), I went upon deck to find Ronayne, and on the way came upon a
most piteous, persistent wail, and the wail's father and mother in
abject, helpless tendance upon it.
Of course my newly-found mother's heart took me straight to the
miserable group; and after a few sympathetic inquiries, I sat down
beside the mother, and took the querulous little creature in my arms,
where presently it hushed off to sleep. How proud I felt! for that's
more than my own baby often condescends to do for my clumsy soothing!
The father skulked away with an immensely relieved look, soon after I
sat down, and the mother grew quite confidential. She told me of the
perfidious nurse's behavior, of the friend's heroic offer, and that they
had not had a wink of sleep the night before at the hotel, for nursing
the baby had made the friend so ill that they had had to send her back
to London that morning. She didn't know but it would have been better if
she and baby had turned back with the overdone friend; but it was her
husband's holiday--six weeks he had--and he worked so hard the rest of
the year--her husband was an author, a journalist (at sight I had
guessed him a literary cus--tomer!--hair parted in the middle, crease--y
clothes, spectacles, a sparse, pointed beard, and narrow, sloping
shoulders, with a stoop in 'em)--and she thought his vacation oughtn't
to be spoiled or deferred by the child; and as he would enjoy it all a
great deal more with her than alone, she had "trusted to luck," and was
going off up the Rhine with him to make a long excursion, before
proceeding to some quiet little town on the Moselle, where another nurse
was in waiting for her. It was their first baby--yes; they had not been
married much over a year. She was fond of it, poor baby! but it was such
a pity it had come! They had not wanted children--children would utterly
interfere with their plan of life. Both its father and herself were busy
people. Oh, there was so much work to be done! and they had married to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account