The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual charactersMorgan, Thomas Hunt
Science
The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual characters
Morgan, Thomas Hunt
Genetics; Poultry; Sex (Biology)
Several hermaphrodite birds have been described (Brandt, 1889; Shattock
and Seligman, 1906; Pearl and Curtis, 1909; Smith and Thomas, 1913;
Bond, 1914; etc.). The most recent and complete account of such birds is
that by Boring and Pearl. They examined in all 8 hermaphrodites, or at
least 8 birds that showed in their plumage, or other secondary sexual
characters, peculiarities of both sexes. Five of the birds came from
Herr Houwink in Meppel, Holland, who had a stock in which there
appeared, in 1911, two hermaphrodites out of 80 birds, and in 1912,
three out of 80 birds. These were the birds studied by Boring and Pearl.
In addition, when Pearl saw Herr Houwink’s birds in 1910, “there were
then on hand a considerable number of these supposed hermaphrodite
birds.” An anatomical study of the Holland birds showed that one of them
was nearly a normal female; three, the authors say, were “evidently
undeveloped females. They have infantile oviducts and embryonic
ovaries.” It should be added that there was a tumor more than twice the
size of the ovary attached to or part of the ovary. If the ovary itself
was affected by the tumor, or the tumor was a part of the ovary, the
slightly unusual condition of the birds might be accounted for. Of the
other 3 birds, 2 are also suspected to have ovarian tumors, while in the
third bird streaks of a secretion which resembles the substance of the
tumor of the other two were found. The change towards male plumage in
these 5 birds is probably due either to the incomplete development of
ovary or to the effect of the tumor on the ovary. Although luteal cells
are described as present, it seems probable that their total number
might be less than in a normal bird, and hence their insufficient
secretion would fail to suppress the development of male plumage. From
this point of view these birds are no more hermaphrodites than is a hen
with her ovary taken out.
The remaining Holland birds were entirely different. On the left side
there was an ovary in an inactive condition; on the right side there was
a testis, producing spermatozoa. Sections of the testis show that it is
normal, consisting of a mass of tubules with very little connective
tissue between them. In both ovary and testis there are “a few nests of
luteal cells near the surface. The ovary contains eggs, but is abnormal
to some extent.” The authors state:
“In external appearance it is more like a male than the others,
which fact correlates well with the active condition of the testis
and inactive diseased ovary, with only one corpus luteum scar. The
interstitial cells can scarcely be held accountable for the male
secondary sex characters, as the only ones in an active secreting
condition are a few in the ovary.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account