The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual charactersMorgan, Thomas Hunt
Science
The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual characters
Morgan, Thomas Hunt
Genetics; Poultry; Sex (Biology)
The occurrence of real testicular tissue in one of the Holland birds and
in three others described by Boring and Pearl, as well as in one
described by Pearl and Curtis, and in another by Shattuck and Seligmann
calls for special comment, since the presence of both testicular and
ovarian tissue in the same bird is the essence of hermaphroditism. In
general there are two ways of looking at such a result. Either the
sex-determining factors have been changed so that in one part of the
body, where the reproductive organs are laid down, one condition can
prevail, in other parts other conditions; or a mixup of the sex
chromosomes has taken place. Until we get some more evidence concerning
such cases it is useless to speculate, although the former view might
seem the most probable of the two if the Holland birds of Herr Houwink’s
flock were in a high degree true hermaphrodites.
But in fact three of the four described by Boring and Pearl were due to
tumors of the ovary, which, if they suppress the normal development of
this organ, would be expected to call forth the appearance of the
secondary sexual characters of the cock. If the likelihood of developing
a tumor were inherited, the frequent occurrence of hen-feathered birds
in this flock would be explained. However, one true hermaphrodite in 4
birds is surprisingly high for a chance result, since hermaphrodite
birds are very rare.
The second interpretation suggested above is one that has been advanced
and established by genetic evidence in _Drosophila_, viz., dislocation
of the sex chromosomes. In the case of birds the male is supposed to be
duplex for the sex factors (ZZ), the female simplex (ZW), and
consequently the chromosome-dislocation hypothesis must be worked out
contrawise in birds and insects. We should have to suppose that such
birds start as males (ZZ), and that at some division of the cells of the
embryo one of the Z’s became lost (left at the cell-wall for example).
All the cells that got ZZ would be male; all that got Z would be female.
If the reproductive region included cells of these two kinds, an
ovotestis would result. The rest of the body should be the same, or
nearly so, since the soma of male and female birds is alike whether ZZ
or Z, except in so far as it is affected by the secretions from the
ovaries (in most races of poultry), or from the testes if the race be
Sebright, Campines, or Hamburgs. Birds with ovotestis might,
nevertheless, be expected, on this view, to show at times an
intermediate condition of the secondary sexual characters, according to
how much internal secretion is produced in the ovotestis. In other
words, the chromosome loss might involve much more extensive regions
than the reproduction organs, but show its effects first in that organ
and then indirectly other parts of the body be affected by the luteal
cells of the testis. There is one rather good piece of evidence that
seems opposed to this interpretation. In the hermaphrodites the oviduct
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account