The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual charactersMorgan, Thomas Hunt
Science
The genetic and the operative evidence relating to secondary sexual characters
Morgan, Thomas Hunt
Genetics; Poultry; Sex (Biology)
Wallace says, referring to the immense tuft of golden plumage in the
best known birds of paradise (_Paradisea apoda_ and _P. minor_) that
springs from a very small area on the side of the breast, that Mr. Frank
E. Beddard, who has kindly examined a specimen, says that “this area
lies upon the pectoral muscles, and near to the point where the fibers
of the muscle converge towards their attachment to the humerus. The
plumes arise, therefore, close to the most powerful muscle of the body,
and near to where the activities of that muscle would be at a maximum.
Furthermore, the area of attachment of the plumes is just above the
point where the arteries and nerves for the supply of the pectoral
muscles, and neighboring regions, leave the interior of the body. The
area of attachment of the plume is, also, as you say in your letter,
just above the junction of the coracoid and sternum.” “Ornamental plumes
of considerable size rise from the same part in many other species of
paradise birds, sometimes extending laterally in front, so as to form
breast shields. They also occur in many hummingbirds, and in some sun
birds and honey-suckers; and in all these cases there is a wonderful
amount of activity and rapid movement, indicating a surplus of vitality,
which is able to manifest itself in the development of these accessory
plumes.”[7]
There are two serious defects in such an attempt to explain the facts.
In the first place, it has been shown in several cases that have been
studied that it is not the lessened “vitality” of the female but the
suppression caused by the ovary that keeps down the development of the
full plumage in that sex. In the second place, the anatomical influences
appealed to are imaginary rather than real, for it is by no means
apparent that the local exits of blood-vessels and nerves to muscles are
at all correlated with the location of the ornamental parts, in the
skin. Even when larger blood-vessels run to the region of excessive
development of feather ornaments it may well be that they go there
because the ornaments in question use them for their nourishment; in
other words, Wallace puts the cart before the horse. The top of the
head, where crests so often develop, the throat coloration and throat
shields of hummingbirds and birds of paradise, the two long tail
feathers of several species of hummingbirds, etc., do not arise, so far
as known, from regions which are conspicuous for a rich supply of blood
and nerves. Wallace’s appeal to underlying organs such as muscles that
supposedly influence the special development of the feathers in the skin
above does not strike one as a fortunate appeal to physiological
principles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account