In the same way, any child born into a primitive hunting society who
found himself with a mutated gene that brought about nearsightedness
would be at a distinct disadvantage. In a modern technological society,
however, nearsighted individuals, doing more poorly at outdoor games,
are often driven into quieter activities that involve reading, thinking,
and studying. This may lead to a career as a scientist, scholar, or
professional man, categories that are valuable in such a society and are
encouraged. Nearsightedness would therefore spread more generally
through civilized societies than through primitive ones.
Then, too, a gene may be advantageous when it occurs in low numbers and
disadvantageous when it occurs in high numbers. Suppose there were a
gene among humans that so affected the personality as to make it
difficult for a human being to endure crowded conditions. Such
individuals would make good explorers, farmers, and herdsmen, but poor
city dwellers. Even in our modern urbanized society, such a gene in
moderate concentration would be good, since we still need our
outdoorsmen. In high concentration, it would be bad, for then the
existence of areas of high population density (on which our society now
seems to depend) might become impossible.
In any species, then, each gene exists in a number of varieties upon
which an absolute “good” or “bad” cannot be unequivocally stamped. These
varieties make up the _gene pool_, and it is this gene pool that makes
evolution possible.
A species with an invariable set of genes could not change to suit
altered conditions. Even a slight shift in the nature of the environment
might suffice to wipe it out.
The possession of a gene pool lends flexibility, however. As conditions
change, one combination of varieties might gain over another and this,
in turn, might produce changes in body characteristics that would then
further alter the relative “goodness” or “badness” of certain gene
patterns.
Thus, over the past million years, for example, the human brain has,
through mutations and appropriate shifts in emphasis within the gene
pool, increased notably in size.
Genetic Load
Some gene mutations produce characteristics so undesirable that it is
difficult to imagine any reasonable change in environmental conditions
that would make them beneficial. There are mutations that lead to the
nondevelopment of hands and feet, to the production of blood that will
not clot, to serious malformations of essential organs, and so on. Such
mutations are unqualifiedly bad.
The badness may be so severe that a fertilized ovum may be incapable of
development; or, if it develops, the fetus miscarries or the child is
stillborn; or, if the child is born alive, it dies before it matures so
that it can never have children of its own. Any mutation that brings
about death before the gene producing it can be passed on to another
generation is a _lethal mutation_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account