Arbitration (International law); Disarmament; Security, International; War
If this matter is looked at realistically and concretely we find that
there is hardly any possibility of the Protocol of Geneva being signed
by any State which is a non-Member of the League. The United States
and Russia will certainly not sign; the admission of Germany and Turkey
to the League is contemplated. The only other States[4] of any
international consequence outside the {12} League are Mexico and Egypt;
and the likelihood of either of these two States becoming a party to
the Protocol of Geneva is too remote for serious consideration.
Accordingly, in the subsequent discussion, I shall assume that,
whatever may be the legal possibilities, there is no real possibility
of any State which is not a Member of the League of Nations becoming a
party to the Protocol of Geneva.
[1] Annex C, p. 156 at p. 167.
[2] Annex D, p. 210 at p. 212.
[3] Under the Resolution of the Council of May 17, 1922, any State may
accept the jurisdiction of the Permanent Court by filing a declaration
to that effect; but this is not the same thing as acceding to the
Protocol of December 16, 1920.
[4] See Membership in the League of Nations, by Manley O. Hudson, A. J.
I. L., July, 1924.
{13}
CHAPTER V.
RELATIONS INTER SE OF THE SIGNATORIES TO THE PROTOCOL.
It is here assumed that only Members of the League of Nations may
become parties to the Protocol of Geneva[1]; the Protocol is a
development of the Covenant and it would, in any view, be logically
impossible for any State, not a Member of the League, to become a
Signatory to the Protocol; on the other hand, Members of the League
are, of course, not obligated to sign or to ratify the Protocol of
Geneva.
Accordingly, if the Protocol shall come into force, the Powers of the
world, from the point of view of the Protocol, will, at least
theoretically, be divided into three classes:
1. Members of the League of Nations who are parties to the
Protocol.
2. Members of the League of Nations who are not parties to the
Protocol.
3. Non-Members of the League of Nations who are not parties to
the Protocol.
From this it follows, again looking at the matter from the point of
view of the Protocol of Geneva, that the international relations of the
various countries of the world would fall into the following six
classes:
1. Relations _inter se_ of the Signatories to the Protocol.
2. Relations _inter se_ of the Members of the League not
Signatories to the Protocol.
3. Relations _inter se_ of non-Members of the League.
4. Relations of the Signatories to the Protocol with the Members
of the League not Signatories thereto.
5. Relations of Members of the League not Signatories to the
Protocol with States non-Members of the League.
6. Relations of the Members of the League Signatories to the
Protocol with States non-Members of the League.
{14}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account