Arbitration (International law); Disarmament; Security, International; War
Accordingly, the "grounds" to be laid down by the Conference for the
Reduction of Armaments, on which it may be declared by the Council that
the Plan for the Reduction of Armaments has not been carried out, will
mean, I take it, the laying down of some requirement that the Plan for
the Reduction of Armaments be formally ratified within a time stated by
a certain number of States, including certain named States; in default
whereof, the Council may and will declare the Plan for the Reduction of
Armaments not to have been carried out.
It is to be observed that the Protocol in the last paragraph of Article
21 speaks of the possibility of a Signatory failing to "comply" with
the reduction of armaments Plan "after the expiration of the period
fixed by the Conference."
{8}
This refers, I think, to a failure by a particular Signatory to ratify
the Plan for the Reduction of Armaments, the effect being, so far as
Article 21 is concerned, that such Signatory would be bound by the
terms of the Protocol but could not benefit by them.
The language of this last paragraph of Article 21 is, however, broad
enough to include the case of a State which had ratified the Treaty
containing the Plan for the Reduction of Armaments and had then failed
to carry out its agreement regarding such reduction.
It will thus be seen that the Protocol of Geneva is wholly dependent
upon the success of the Conference for the Reduction of Armaments; and
the success of that Conference depends wholly upon the voluntary
agreement then made. There is nothing in the Protocol which requires
the States represented at the Conference to agree to any particular
plan for the reduction of armaments; the assent which they may give to
such plan must be voluntary.
The question of the proceedings of the Disarmament Conference will be
discussed hereafter.[4]
However, there is one point that may be mentioned here. The Plan for
the Reduction of Armaments drawn up by the Conference or, in other
words, the Treaty or Treaties drawn up by that Conference, will not be
perpetual in their operation. No plan for disarmament, no treaty
regarding reduction of armaments could possibly be perpetual in its
detailed provisions. Not only does this follow from the nature of such
an agreement, but it is explicitly laid down in Article 8 of the
Covenant that any such Plan is to be subject to reconsideration and
revision at least every ten years. Accordingly, the Treaty or Treaties
for the Reduction of Armaments to be drawn up by the Conference will be
in this sense temporary, that they will have a fixed limit of time for
their operation, precisely as the Treaty Limiting Naval Armament drawn
up at the Washington Conference may be terminated in 1936.[5]
{9}
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account