The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
Martial tells of a curious incident at an auction in which a girl
slave was offered for sale. When the bidding failed to elicit a higher
offer, Gellianus, the celebrated auctioneer, ended his eulogy of the
beauty of the human merchandize by giving the young slave a couple of
kisses. “What happened?” says Martial in conclusion. “A buyer who had
just made a bid of 600 sesterces on the girl, immediately withdrew his
offer.” Times are changed. It is no longer a question of selling slaves
in our modern _atrium auctionarium_, but the auction room itself has
nevertheless remained about the same, a great place of interest, an
assemblage of types such as old Tongilius, Licinius and Paullus who,
revived and modernized, gather in our sale-rooms, elbowing the crowds
of bidders, among whom are shrewd, clever buyers, true, impassioned
collectors, cool and self-possessed customers.
The auction room is no less freakish than in olden times. There may be,
in fact, reason in the refusal to bid for young slaves that the buyer
considers defiled by the kisses of the auctioneer, even if he were a
Gellianus, the man _à la mode_; but we can find none, for instance, in
what happened some years ago at the celebrated Castellani sale in Rome.
On account of Castellani’s high reputation among collectors and the
fine things offered, this sale gathered to Rome a cosmopolitan crowd of
connoisseurs. While a fine Cafaggiolo vase was under the hammer, the
employé who was exhibiting it to the public dropped it and it broke to
pieces. At the moment of the accident the object had just been sold
to the last bidder, who naturally enough, immediately declared his
offer cancelled, as he had made a bid on a sound vase and not a heap of
debris. The auctioneer then proposed to put the fragments of the vase
up to auction and a fresh start was made. Strange to say the second
bidding reached a higher figure than the vase had fetched when offered
to the public intact and in all its faultless beauty. But for the
consideration that the second sale may have tempted some who regretted
that they had let slip the chance to bid on the fine Cafaggiolo, one
would be inclined to deduce that in the world of curios an object
acquires more worth the more it is damaged.
It is true that while a broken china vase is practically worthless, a
piece of faience does not lose value by being broken and put together
again, if it does not actually rise in value, as in the case of the
Castellani Cafaggiolo.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account