The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
According to the opinion of a well-known Florentine antiquary and
famous restorer of paintings for the American market, a picture has
nothing to gain from the hand of the restorer. On the contrary, his
opinion is that: “As soon as a restorer lays hands on a painting he
ruins it.”
The class we have placed between the two extremes, the one using a
certain discrimination, accepting such methods as are intended merely
to preserve the work without encroaching upon its artistic merits,
such as furnishing a fresh panel or canvas to a painting, removing
old and deteriorated varnish, etc., being the wise one is, of course,
represented by the minority.
Needless to say, the main forces of the class supporting restoration in
its extreme form are drawn from the ranks of restorers or authors of
works teaching the grand art of resuscitating masterpieces, such men as
Merimée, Vergnaud, Prange, Deon, Forni and Secco Suardo. The latter, in
fact, does not hesitate to call restoration a magic art and depicts the
restorer as a regular miracle-worker.
We do not propose in this chapter to follow the various methods of
restoring paintings according to the character of the work, fresco,
tempera or oil, but simply to indicate some of the restoration
processes that are useful to fakers in deceiving inexperienced
collectors.
In the case of faking up an old painting of weak or defective
character, into the delusive suggestion of a work of good quality, the
process consists principally of bringing the form into proper shape by
veiling and toning the crude parts of the colouring. This work, the
success of which chiefly depends upon the skill and versatility of the
forger, is generally effected by first removing the old varnish with a
solvent. There are many kinds of solvents which can be used, according
to the quality of the varnish, the most common, however, is alcohol. It
must be very pure, containing the minimum of water. Ordinary alcohol
is likely to produce opaque, white patches, a phenomenon called by the
French restorer _chanci_, and very difficult to obliterate once it has
appeared. Being one of the strongest solvents and of dangerous and too
rapid action at times, the alcohol is generally mixed with turpentine
to the proportion of half-and-half to start with. Then, according to
the greater or lesser solubility of the varnish, the proportion of
alcohol is gradually increased. This mixture, called _la mista_ by
Italian antiquaries, may be substituted, as we have said, by various
solvents--potash, soda, ammonia, etc.--according to the nature or
hardness of the varnish to be dissolved. Some restorers also resort
to mechanical methods to remove old varnish. These methods, too, are
various. If the varnish is hard it can be cracked by pressure from
the thumb, a long operation requiring no small amount of patience
and skill. If it possesses sufficient elasticity to withstand this
process, it is generally removed with a steel blade in the form of an
eraser.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account