The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
The latter operation is not only very difficult but very slow,
particularly when the painting possesses artistic qualities that must
not be impaired by the removal of the varnish.
This first operation successfully accomplished, the artist steps in and
proceeds to help the work, say of such and such a school, to resemble
the painting of the master of this school as much as possible. The
process is naturally executed by the aid of a more or less complete
collection of photographs of the work of the master the faker intends
to imitate. The retouching may follow the most varied methods. To
take the most common case, that of oil painting, the new work can be
carried out with oil colours previously kept on blotting-paper to
drain off the oil which is then substituted with turpentine to give
the colours their lost fluidity; it may also be effected with tempera
colours or with colours the fluid element of which consists only of
varnish. The use of tempera is preferred by restorers because, although
it presents the extreme difficulty of changing hue when varnished and
consequently demands no little experience to judge the requisite hue
or tone, still once laid down it is not likely to change with time as
oil retouching on old paintings generally does. The mixing of colour
with varnish alone has the advantage of keeping the proper tone from
beginning to end. This method is extremely useful not only in the
painting of missing parts but also to veil and tone what has been
painted in tempera if this is not entirely harmonious with the rest
after varnishing. Needless to add, those colours the fluid part of
which is supplied by varnish are unalterable as they do not contain any
oil whatever. One of the difficulties in handling these pigments is the
lack of fluidity, hence turpentine may be added with advantage.
However, as the above methods of retouching are not proof against
chemical tests, alcohol being the proper solvent with which to do away
with added touches to old paintings which have been done with either
oil or varnish colours, the shrewder fakers either mix amber varnish
with the colours or give the fresh touches a solid coating of this
varnish, which when well prepared is supposed to be insoluble and not
easily acted upon by solvents. Although more than one special work on
the art of restoring gives recipes for the preparation of this varnish,
in practice very few know how to prepare it in the proper way.
We have here presupposed that the picture was in good order, that
there were no missing parts of importance, or rather that, with panel
or canvas unimpaired, the work only required to be retouched by the
artist, a rare case, as when the paint has vanished the preparation of
the panel or canvas has generally vanished with it, on account of its
adhesiveness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account