The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day — John Shaqi
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
“Do you know my daily prayer?--Great Gods! let me keep the little I
own, less if it is your pleasure; let me live according to my choice
the days your indulgence has granted me; let me have plenty of books,
one year’s income in advance that I may not be obliged to live day by
day from hand to mouth.... As regards the peace of my heart and my
happiness, that is my affair” (_Sat._, II, 6).
Such contrarieties have a genuine echo in our society where the
bibliomaniac is rarely a literary man or even slightly interested in
literature. Bibliomaniacs collected volumes for the most part either
because some of them were considered rare, and therefore advertised
the high price paid for them, or because they might serve as a
decorative show, but the collecting of general art and curios, with
a few exceptions, appears to have been vacuous and freakish. Even
specialization, which is held to be progress in modern times, but as a
matter of fact more often merely represents the triumph of erudition
over art and taste, exercised in Rome the momentary tyranny of fashion.
An example of this specialization is given us by the craze in Rome for
Corinthian bronze. Without entering into a discussion about the legend
of its origin, and simply hinting that there are strong proofs that the
alloy existed long before the siege of Corinth, we are safe in saying
that the craze in Rome for Corinthian bronze was one of those freaks
of fashion that has had, perhaps, no echo in all the after-history of
“collectomania.” Every amateur was at that time bound to have at least
one vase of the coveted metal. According to Pliny (XXXIV, 1, 2, 3) in
his time this metal was equal to gold in value. In order to obtain two
vases of this precious metal Mark Antony ordered the assassination of
the owner, and it must be borne in mind that Mark Antony was accused
of using golden vessels for the lowest services of his household.
Octavianus, supposed to be a collector of mild passions and a man who
certainly did give up all such hobbies on becoming emperor, was also
very fond of the fashionable metal--_corinthiorum præcupidus_--and did
not scruple to adopt the methods of Sulla and Mark Antony to gratify
his ultra-fashionable taste.
Times were then ripe for all forms of degeneration. Connoisseurs,
like those of to-day, began to discuss _patina_. As it required years
for Corinthian bronze to assume the proper patina--_Nobilis ærugo_,
Horace calls it--it was natural that this alloy should have the
preference over all other kinds of bronze. But there were gradations
of colour even in this metal and value was discriminated according to
the quality of the _patina_. Of these _patinæ_ the Roman collector
recognized five different kinds. Apart from these varying degrees of
merit, the connoisseur, Pliny tells us, could tell the quality of the
alloy from its weight and determine the excellency of the _patina_ by
its smell.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account