The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
We know but vaguely of imitations in painting, but an assembly of such
versatile artists can hardly have refrained from imitating the work
of some master. Besides, the very teacher at the head of a school did
not seem to resent it even if a pupil signed the name of his master.
But as regards imitating the antique, there were hardly any samples to
imitate. The grotesques of the old Roman ruins may have suggested to
more than one artist a new type of decoration; but this plagiarism,
if it can be called so, though not without influence on fifteenth and
sixteenth-century art, found no practical issue with fakers.
There is, however, an incident in which a piece of faking saved to
Florence a masterpiece of Raphael. It is related by Vasari in Andrea
del Sarto’s life. According to Vasari when Frederick II, Duke of
Mantua, came to Florence he greatly admired the portrait of Pope Leo
X, the magnificent painting now hanging in the Gallery of the Pitti
Palace in Florence. His admiration turned to such greedy desire of
possession that when he reached Rome he begged the then all-powerful
Clement VII to procure it for him. The Pope agreed to the Duke’s
request and ordered Ottaviano Medici, then residing in Florence,
to have the painting packed and sent to Mantua to Duke Frederick.
Ottaviano Medici, a lover of art and a Florentine, hating to deprive
his city of such a work, was yet not inclined to resist the wish of the
Pope and resorted to a ruse. He informed the Pope that the painting
should be sent to the Duke, according to His Holiness’ orders, as
soon as the frame had been repaired. The Duke of Mantua was also
informed that the frame needed regilding and that the painting should
be shipped as soon as the repairs were finished. With this excuse
Ottaviano Medici gained the necessary time and ordered from Andrea
del Sarto an exact copy of Raphael’s work, a copy that all experts
would mistake for the original. The work was done to such perfection
that even Ottaviano Medici, who was an art connoisseur, could not tell
the original from the copy: the pseudo-Raphael was sent off, the Duke
was duped and one of the finest portraits by Raphael was saved to
Florence. In Vasari there are comments here and there which lead us to
think that many others may have been duped by the versatility of the
fifteenth and sixteenth-century painters. We know that Bellini’s pupils
finished three-quarters of some of the great Venetian master’s works,
that Calchar imitated Titian so closely as to be taken for the great
Vecelli, but we do not know to what extent lovers of art of the time
may have been duped.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account