The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present dayNobili, Riccardo
History
The Gentle Art of Faking: A history of the methods of producing imitations & spurious works of art from the earliest times up to the present day
Nobili, Riccardo
Art -- Forgeries; Collectors and collecting; Forgery of antiquities
“_La collection c’est l’homme_,” a well-known French lover of art and
first-rate connoisseur used to say. Nowadays this transformation of
Buffon’s threadbare saying is only partially true. It would, perhaps,
be more correct to put it in the past tense, as a new type of virtuoso
has arisen. A collector of the most recent brand prefers to buy
collections “ready-made.” Such collections all gathered in good order
in the houses of these new collectors speak very eloquently of the
owner’s financial power, but say nothing of his taste, ability, or love
for the artistically fine and beautiful.
However, this being somewhat of a recent change brought about by casual
circumstances with hardly any claim as an artistic phenomenon, this
study can be confined for the present to that normal period, barely
past, when the art and curio collector was really a “collector” and
above all a lover of art as well as a passionate hunter after fine
things. From the study of this semi-past world of art it will be easy
to proceed to a comparative analysis of the up-to-date one, to the
new species of collector who in no way comes under the definition “_La
collection c’est l’homme_.”
In the foregoing review of collectors and collections, it has mostly
been a question of art collectors, with only incidental reference to
other kinds of art lovers. Curios, however, imply many other things.
The French word _curieux_, which has often been used for lack of a
better expression, has a wider meaning. The word _curieux_, which
might be translated by the English word “curious,” without losing
much of its meaning, may have originated in the Latin _curiosis_,
though it is doubtful whether the Romans ever applied this word to
connoisseurs of art or other collectors. The fact that the artistic
world was then divided into lovers of the beautiful and faddists or
fools, that erudites had not yet appeared, may have rendered new words
of definitions useless. When speaking of his friend Statius as a
connoisseur and virtuoso, Pliny uses the Greek word φιλόαλος (friend of
the beautiful), a word that might really be used to define the true and
genuine collector.
The French word _curieux_ appears for the first time in a dictionary
by Robert Estienne (1531) and is defined _ung homme curieux d’avoir ou
sçavoir choses antiques_ but later on, presumably from its probable
Italian origin, the word acquires a wider sense, a sense that
even finds an echo in Shakespeare, and so also the old meaning of
_gentilezza_ as used by Lorenzo Medici has a resonance, according to
Lacroix du Maine, in the French _gentillesses ou gentilles curiositez_.
[Illustration: A CHILD.
By Ferrante Zampini.]
[Illustration: SAN GIOVANNI.
By Ferrante Zampini.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account