The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
The two last-named writers set forth an elaboration of an opinion first
held by the Pythagoreans and worked out in detail by Crates of Mallos in
the second century before Christ, which gained great ascendancy over the
minds of map makers and writers of the Middle Ages. They explained that
the _oikoumene_ is one of four similar inhabited bodies of land on the
surface of the globe. These bodies of land are separated from one
another by two oceans which encircle the earth, one running east and
west in the fiery equatorial regions, and one running north and south at
right angles to the equatorial ocean. This idea, which we shall call the
“Cratesian” theory after its foremost expositor, did not pass
unchallenged either in antiquity or in the Christian period. Involving
as it did the doctrine of the antipodes—people dwelling in quarters
absolutely inaccessible to men of our race, eternally cut off from our
_oikoumene_ by the fires of the equator and the terrors of the
meridional ocean—the Cratesian theory provoked the indignation of the
Fathers of the Church as containing the seeds of heresy.[66]
EXTENT OF THE “OIKOUMENE”
Aristotle, although he had derived from the Pythagoreans the theory of
an uninhabitable torrid belt,[67] believed in a greater southward
extension of our _oikoumene_ than would be possible in accordance with
the Cratesian theory. He harbored no idea of the existence of another
_oikoumene_ in the same latitude as ours. He says very clearly in the
_De caelo_[68] that there is no great distance between India and Spain
and hinted at the same opinion in the _Meteorology_.[69] Seneca[70] held
similar views.
The opposite theory—which has been called the continental as opposed to
the oceanic hypothesis[71]—that Africa and Asia extended unknown
distances south and east and that the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, like
the Caspian Sea, were enclosed basins—also had its adherents, among them
Herodotus, Hipparchus, and, most significant of all, Ptolemy. But
Ptolemy’s _Geography_, though its content was reflected in Arabic
notions of the earth’s surface, had almost no readers in the Christian
West until the fifteenth century, and the works of Herodotus and
Hipparchus were unknown.
_PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY_
ARISTOTLE, SENECA, AND PLINY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account