The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western EuropeWright, John Kirtland
History
The geographical lore of the time of the Crusades : $b A study in the history of medieval science and tradition in Western Europe
Wright, John Kirtland
Geography -- History; Geography, Medieval
ORIGIN OF RIVERS
To return from this digression to the vexed question of the origin of
super-terrestrial rivers, we find that the circulation of water from the
sea either by underground passages or by rain was not regarded by the
majority of ancient thinkers as sufficient to account for the huge
volumes of water that rivers constantly pour into the sea. Plato had
thought that there were enormous reservoirs in the interior of the earth
which served to keep the rivers supplied,[129] but Aristotle rejected
this hypothesis.[130] A reservoir as large as the entire earth, he said,
would be necessary for the purpose. His explanation was worked out of
the theory that one element actually may be transformed into another. In
a relatively unscientific age what is more natural than to believe, when
one sees soluble substances passing into solution in water, that they
actually become water? Or when one sees the condensation of invisible
vapor into clouds and of clouds into rain, that the air is actually
turning to water? Aristotle, followed by Seneca,[131] argued that the
air which penetrates into the internal cavities and recesses of the
earth is chilled and liquefied by the cold encountered there, just as
air seems to be condensed by cold in the outer atmosphere. Aristotle
cited as a proof of this the supposed fact that most great rivers have
their sources in mountains.[132] Mountains were to be looked upon as
enormous elevated sponges exuding water on all sides. Aristotle
concluded likewise that the northern part of the earth must be high and
mountainous,[133] because many great rivers originate there. But, if the
air is transmutable into water, why, then, was it not perfectly logical
to suppose that the earth could also undergo a similar change? This as a
theory to explain the origin of some of the water of rivers was clearly
expressed by Seneca and, among the early Church Fathers, by Gregory of
Nyssa.[134] The faulty character of Seneca’s scientific thought is seen
in his failure to account satisfactorily for the logical demands of his
theory, i. e. for the replacement of the land lost by its liquefaction.
THE NILE FLOOD
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account