The Geography of the Region about Devil's Lake and the Dalles of the Wisconsin: With Some Notes on Its Surface GeologySalisbury, Rollin D.
Science
The Geography of the Region about Devil's Lake and the Dalles of the Wisconsin: With Some Notes on Its Surface Geology
Salisbury, Rollin D.
Physical geography; Wisconsin -- Description and travel
When the extreme hardness of the quartzite is remembered and also the
extent of the erosion which affected it (Fig. 4) before the next
succeeding formation was deposited, it is safe to conclude that the
period of erosion was very long.
_Thickness of the quartzite._--The thickness of the quartzite is not
known, even approximately. The great thickness in the south range
suggested by the diagram (Fig. 4) may perhaps be an exaggeration.
Faulting which has not been discovered may have occurred, causing
repetition of beds at the surface (Fig. 6), and so an exaggerated
appearance of thickness. After all allowances have been made, it is
still evident that the thickness of the quartzite is very great.
II. THE HISTORY OF THE PALEOZOIC STRATA.
_The subsidence._--Following the long period of erosion, the irregular
and almost mountainous area of central Wisconsin was depressed
sufficiently to submerge large areas which had been land. The subsidence
was probably slow, and as the sea advanced from the south, it covered
first the valleys and lowlands, and later the lower hills and ridges,
while the higher hills and ridges of the quartzite stood as islands in
the rising sea. Still later, the highest ridges of the region were
themselves probably submerged.
[Illustration: Fig. 6.--A diagrammatic cross-section, showing how, by
faulting, the apparent thickness of the quartzite would be increased.]
_The Potsdam sandstone (and conglomerate)._--So soon as the sea began to
overspread the region, its bottom became the site of deposition, and the
deposition continued as long as the submergence lasted. It is to the
sediments deposited during the earlier part of this submergence that the
name _Potsdam_ is given.
The sources of the sediments are not far to seek. As the former land was
depressed beneath the sea, its surface was doubtless covered with the
products of rock decay, consisting of earths, sands, small bits and
larger masses of quartzite. These materials, or at least the finer
parts, were handled by the waves of the shallow waters, for they were at
first shallow, and assorted and re-distributed. Thus the residuary
products on the submerged surface, were one source of sediments.
From the shores also, so long as land areas remained, the waves derived
sediments. These were composed in part of the weathered products of the
rock, and in part of the undecomposed rock against which the waves
beat, after the loose materials had been worn away. These sediments
derived from the shore were shifted, and finally mingled with those
derived from the submerged surface.
So long as any part of the older land remained above the water, its
streams brought sediments to the sea. These also were shifted by the
waves and shore currents, and finally deposited with the others on the
eroded surface of the quartzite. Thus sediments derived in various ways,
but inherently essentially similar, entered into the new formation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account