The Geologic Story of Arches National Park: Geological Survey Bulletin 1393Lohman, Stanley William
Science
The Geologic Story of Arches National Park: Geological Survey Bulletin 1393
Lohman, Stanley William
Arches National Park (Utah); Geology -- Utah -- Arches National Park -- Guidebooks
Not exposed in the area but present far beneath the sedimentary cover
and exposed in several places a few miles to the northeast are examples
of the other two principal types of rocks—(1) igneous rocks, solidified
from molten rock forced into or above preexisting rocks along cracks,
joints, and faults, and (2) much older metamorphic rocks, formed from
other preexisting rock types by great heat and pressure at extreme
depths. Igneous rocks of Tertiary age (fig. 59) form the nearby La Sal
Mountains. The particles comprising the sedimentary rocks in the area
were derived by weathering and erosion of all three types of rocks in
various source areas.
Arches National Park and nearby Canyonlands National Park are both in
the heart of the Canyon Lands Section of the Plateau; therefore, it is
only reasonable to wonder why the differences in their general character
seemingly outweigh their similarities. First, let us consider the
similarities. Both parks are underlain by dominantly red sedimentary
rocks, both parks feature unusual erosional forms of sandstone, and both
contain beautiful natural arches, although the arches in Canyonlands are
restricted almost entirely to the southeastern part of The Needles
section and are in much older rocks than those in Arches.
To be sure, differences in the rocks themselves play a part in the
dissimilarity of the two parks, and these differences are of two types.
First, there are lateral changes in the character of the strata, known
to geologists as facies changes, brought about by differences in the
environment, in the type of materials, and in the mode of deposition
even within relatively short distances. Thus, during parts of the
Permian Period while sand, later to be known as the Cedar Mesa and White
Rim Sandstone Members of the Cutler Formation, was being deposited in
the southern part of Canyonlands, red mud, silt, and sand of the Cutler
were laid down farther north in Canyonlands (Lohman, 1974, fig. 9), and
similar, though somewhat coarser, beds of the Cutler were laid down at
Arches (fig. 4). Further comparisons of the rock columns in the two
parks show that while limestones of the Rico Formation were being
deposited in a shallow sea in the southern part of Canyonlands,
additional red mud, silt, and sand of the Cutler were being laid down
above sea level in areas to the northeast. The source of the coarser
materials was the ancient Uncompahgre Highland, which stood above sea
level from Late Pennsylvanian time to Late Triassic time (figs. 7, 59).
Although wider and longer, it occupied about the same position as the
present Uncompahgre Plateau between Grand Junction and Gateway, Colo.
Streams eroded the hard igneous and metamorphic rocks from this ancient
landmass and dumped the material into basins to the northeast and
southwest. The basin to the southwest, now called the Paradox basin
(after Paradox Valley, Colo.), at intervals contained shallow seas and
lagoons, which I will discuss later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account