The Geologic Story of Arches National Park: Geological Survey Bulletin 1393Lohman, Stanley William
Science
The Geologic Story of Arches National Park: Geological Survey Bulletin 1393
Lohman, Stanley William
Arches National Park (Utah); Geology -- Utah -- Arches National Park -- Guidebooks
Arches National Park and most of nearby Canyonlands National Park lie
within what geologists have termed the “Paradox basin,” which contains a
remarkable assemblage of sediments called the Paradox Member of the
Hermosa Formation. These deposits were laid down in shallow seas and
lagoons during Middle Pennsylvanian time, roughly 300 million years ago
(fig. 59). As indicated in figure 4, the Paradox Member contains, in
addition to shale and limestone, minerals deposited by the evaporation
and concentration of sea water—common salt, gypsum, anhydrite, and
potash salts. For this reason such deposits are collectively called
evaporites. Figure 7 also shows that the northeastern part of the
Paradox basin, which is the deepest part, contains a series of partly
alined anticlines which have cores of salt and, hence, are called salt
anticlines. As might be expected, roughly alined synclines intervene
between the anticlines, but are not shown because of space limitations.
According to Cater (1970, p. 50): “The salt anticlines of Utah and
Colorado are unique in North America both in structure and in mode of
development.” To this may be added that they also are relatively rare in
the world.
A section across the Salt Valley anticline and the Courthouse syncline
in the northwestern part of the park is shown in figure 8, and the axes
of these structures are shown in figure 9.
Normally, a series of roughly parallel northwestward-trending folds
would result from shortening of a segment of the Earth’s crust by
compressive forces from the northeast and the southwest, but such does
not seem to be the origin of these folds. The folds occur in a
relatively narrow belt along the northeastern part of the Paradox basin,
the deepest part, which was broken by a series of northwesterly trending
normal faults (fig. 6) that cut the deep-lying Precambrian and older
Paleozoic rocks (fig. 8) prior to the deposition of the salt-bearing
Paradox Member of the Hermosa Formation. Movement along these faults
continued intermittently during and after deposition of the Paradox,
however, and resulted in the formation of a series of northwesterly
trending ridges and troughs. Following Paradox time, normal sediments
derived from a rising landmass to the northeast began to fill the basin.
These sediments accumulated most rapidly and to greater thicknesses in
the fault-derived troughs. Salt differs from normal sediments in two
properties critical to the development of salt anticlines: first, salt
is considerably lighter (fig. 10), and, second, salt under pressure will
flow slowly by plastic deformation, much like ice in a glacier flows
slowly downstream. Thus, salt in the troughs underlying the thicker and
heavier masses of sediments was squeezed into the adjoining ridges,
causing them to rise. Once started, this process tended to be
self-perpetuating, as the flow of salt from beneath the thick masses of
sediments in the troughs made room for the accumulation of still greater
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account