The routine of naval espionage is very similar in character to that
followed by military spies. The naval spy, however, must be a rather
more intelligent and highly trained man than his military confrere, and
cases that have come to light prove that his position is one of more
responsibility, and that he is entrusted with more funds for the
carrying out of his work. It is an interesting fact that, for many
years past, officers and men of the German naval service have been
employed along the East coast of England in compiling extremely detailed
plans of places and fortifications. The accuracy of these plans is
ascertained by persistent redrawing done by new members of the naval
espionage staff, and all changes in building, roadmaking,
bridge-construction, and as far as possible the interior work of
fortifications, are duly recorded on the Berlin maps. Not that this
information is of definite working value at the present time, but the
principle of secret-service headquarters is that no item is too trivial
for record, and information is acquired without regard to its direct
uses, but in view of the fact that it may possibly be of some use at a
future date. The adoption of such a principle involves an immense
amount of work in checking and sorting the masses of information
obtained, but beyond doubt the principle itself has gone far to assure
such successes as German arms have obtained, either on land or at sea.
In addition to the work of fixed naval posts, stationed at dockyards and
harbours, the work of spies at sea must not be overlooked, either in
time of peace or in war. In the former case an innocent-looking trawler
or private yacht is useful for taking soundings, ascertaining channels,
and even locating naval mines used for purposes of harbour defence and
fired by land contact. In time of war the services which may be
performed by such vessels are even more valuable; the reports of the
sinking of three British cruisers by German submarine attack are fairly
unanimous with regard to the presence of a trawler in the vicinity of
the spot at which the engagement took place. All that can be definitely
learned with regard to this trawler is that she was not a British boat,
and it is reasonable to assume that her business consisted in signalling
to the submarines particulars which they may have been unable to obtain
themselves, or in shielding them from sight during their approach
towards the cruisers. Although there are no substantial proofs of this
assumption, it is hardly likely that the vessel was a trawler engaged in
usual and legitimate business.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account