The Ghost-dance religion and the Sioux outbreak of 1890 : $b Fourteenth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology, part 2.Mooney, James
Religion
The Ghost-dance religion and the Sioux outbreak of 1890 : $b Fourteenth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology, part 2.
Mooney, James
Dakota Indians -- Wars, 1890-1891; Ghost dance
+Assistant Adjutant-General+,
_Department of Dakota, Saint Paul, Minnesota_.
+Sir+: In compliance with instructions of the department commander—copy
attached marked A—I have the honor to submit the following report as
the result of my investigations into the matters referred to therein.
I have been at this post continuously since August 6, 1887, and
inspector of Indian supplies at the Cheyenne River Indian agency,
located here, during that period, and am at the present time.
The Indians of this agency have a standing list of grievances which
they present at every opportunity, and talk about in council when they
assemble at every monthly ration issue. The Indians most persistent in
recounting and proclaiming their grievances are those least willing to
help in bettering their condition, and who are opposed to any change or
improvement of their old habits and customs, and oppose all progress.
Of this class I cite Big Foot’s band of irreconcilables—who have now
ceased to complain—and those in accord with them. Except in the matter
of short rations, the story of their wrongs needs no attention. It
commences with a recital of the wrong done them by the white race
sharing the earth with them.
The other class, comprising a large majority of Indians of the
reservation, have accepted the situation forced upon them, and have
been for years bravely struggling in the effort to reconcile themselves
to the ways of civilization and moral progress, with a gratifying
degree of success. It is this class whose complaints and grievances
demand considerate attention. They complain in true Indian style that
they only have kept faith in all treaties made with them, and that
somehow the treaties when they appeared in print were not in many
respects the treaties which they signed.
They complain principally—
(1) That the boundaries of the reservation in the treaty of 1877 are
not what they agreed to and thought they were signing on the paper,
and they especially emphasize the point that the line of the western
boundary should be a _straight line_ at the Black Hills, instead of as
it appears on the maps.
(2) That they have never received full recompense for the ponies taken
from them in 1876.
(3) That the game has been destroyed and driven out of the country by
the white people.
(4) That their children are taken from them to eastern schools and kept
for years, instead of being educated among them.
(5) That when these eastern graduates return to them with civilized
habits, education, and trades, there is no provision made on the
reservation for their employment and improvement to the benefit of
themselves and their people.
(6) That the agents and employees sent out to them have not all been
“good men” and considerate of their (the Indians’) interests and
welfare.
(7) That the issue of their annuity goods is delayed so late in the
winter as to cause them much suffering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account