The Ghost-dance religion and the Sioux outbreak of 1890 : $b Fourteenth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology, part 2.Mooney, James
Religion
The Ghost-dance religion and the Sioux outbreak of 1890 : $b Fourteenth annual report of the Bureau of Ethnology, part 2.
Mooney, James
Dakota Indians -- Wars, 1890-1891; Ghost dance
Thus died Tata′nka I′yota′nke, Sitting Bull, the great medicine-man of
the Sioux, on the morning of December 15, 1890, aged about 56 years.
He belonged to the Uncpapa division of the Teton Sioux. Although a
priest rather than a chief, he had gained a reputation in his early
years by organizing and leading war parties, and became prominent by
his participation in the battle of Little Bighorn, in Montana, on
June 25, 1876, by which Custer’s command was wiped out of existence.
Being pursued by General Terry, Sitting Bull and his band made their
escape northward into Canada, where they remained until 1881, when he
surrendered, through the mediation of the Canadian authorities, on a
promise of pardon. To obtain subsistence while in Canada, his people
had been obliged to sell almost all they possessed, including their
firearms, so that they returned to their old homes in an impoverished
condition. After confinement as a prisoner of war until 1883, Sitting
Bull took up his residence on Grand river, where he remained until he
met his death. Here he continued to be the leader of the opposition to
civilization and the white man, and his camp became the rallying point
for the dissatisfied conservative element that clung to the old order
of things, and felt that innovation meant destruction to their race.
For seven years he had steadily opposed the treaty by which the great
Sioux reservation was at last broken up in 1889. After the treaty had
been signed by the requisite number to make it a law, he was asked by a
white man what the Indians thought about it. With a burst of passionate
indignation he replied, “Indians! There are no Indians left now but
me.” However misguided he may have been in thus continuing a losing
fight against the inevitable, it is possible that from the Indian point
of view he may have been their patriot as he was their high priest.
He has been mercilessly denounced as a bad man and a liar; but there
can be no doubt that he was honest in his hatred of the whites, and
his breaking of the peace pipe, saying that he “wanted to fight and
wanted to die,” showed that he was no coward. But he represented the
past. His influence was incompatible with progress, and his death marks
an era in the civilization of the Sioux. In the language of General
Miles, “His tragic fate was but the ending of a tragic life. Since the
days of Pontiac, Tecumseh, and Red Jacket no Indian has had the power
of drawing to him so large a following of his race and molding and
wielding it against the authority of the United States, or of inspiring
it with greater animosity against the white race and civilization.”
(_War, 9._)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account