The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1002, March 11, 1899 — John Shaqi
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1002, March 11, 1899Various
General
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1002, March 11, 1899
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
I knew five sisters once very intimately. They had a bad father whom
they never saw—though he was living—after the eldest of the five was
about twelve, and their mother was very poor. But they clung together
and shared the daily labour—pleasure they knew little of—and when
two families of richer relatives had become poor, and the members
separated, disunion having partly ruined them, the sisters still held a
brave and respectable front to the world, being able to do this because
they kept together, serving their mother’s God and having a common
faith and practice. “Did none of them marry?” I fancy some of you
asking mentally. Yes, two have now good husbands and pleasant homes;
and God comforts and strengthens the other three in His own way which
is always for the best.
(_To be continued._)
VARIETIES.
THE EDUCATION OF WOMEN.
Few in the present generation know how very modern the real education
of women is. Dr. More, in the middle of last century, was frightened at
his daughter Hannah’s cleverness, and made her leave off the study of
Latin and mathematics.
Mrs. Somerville, who was born in 1780, says that when she was getting
on with mathematics her father, Admiral Fairfax, said to her mother,
“We must put a stop to this or we shall have Mary in a strait-jacket
one of these days.”
When Hannah More and her friend, Miss Harrison, began teaching poor
girls in barns and brick kitchens, they were told they would ruin
agriculture, that if servants learned to read they would read their
mistresses’ letters, and if they learned to write they would forge
their mistresses’ names.
IN A YOUNG LADY’S ALBUM.
The American author, James Russell Lowell, had as happy a knack as has
ever been known of writing album verses. When he was in this country,
Professor Max Müller’s daughter, Beatrice, asked him to give her a few
lines, and this is what he wrote—
“O’er the wet sands an insect crept,
Ages ere man on earth was known,
And patient Time, while Nature slept,
The slender tracing turned to stone.
’Twas the first autograph; and ours?
Prithee, how much of prose or song,
In league with the creative powers,
Shall ’scape Oblivion’s broom so long?”
RICHES.—Virtue is the best riches; knowledge the next, and what are
usually called riches the worst.
THE RIGHT RENDERING.
The following incident is recorded by the Bishop of Durham: Archbishop
Whately, in his last illness, begged a friend to read to him St. Paul’s
description of the Christian’s hope as he looks “for the Saviour, the
Lord Jesus Christ, who shall change” (so the friend read from the
Authorised Version) “our vile body that it may be fashioned like unto
His glorious body.”
“No, no,” interrupted the Archbishop, “give his own words! He never
called God’s works vile!”
And so we now read in the Revised Version, “Who shall fashion anew the
body of our humiliation that it may be conformed to the body of His
glory?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account