The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1006, April 8, 1899 — John Shaqi
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1006, April 8, 1899Various
General
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1006, April 8, 1899
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
The confidential talk which followed was a remarkable one. Two of
the greatest men of their age met, each bent upon the good of his
country—each willing to sacrifice for the good of the other what might
be advantageous for himself. One by birth was Irish, one by birth
was Scotch, but both were British—nay, English!—to the backbone. Sir
Arthur Wellesley, in age only eight years the younger, was still at
the opening of his grand career; Sir John Moore, after thirty years of
hard service, was fast nearing the close of his. Sir John’s at this
date was a worldwide fame. Sir Arthur, though he had made his mark by
a successful campaign in India, was still not very famous beyond a
certain circle. But Moore had noted his power.
They went into the matter calmly together—Wellesley’s strongly-outlined
eagle face and large Roman nose contrasting with the refined beauty
of Moore’s features. In force of character, however, in strength of
will, in courage and patriotism, in freedom from all narrowness of
party spirit, the two were alike. “Although I hold a high office under
Government I am no party man,” Wellesley had declared in that memorable
letter to Moore, received only the day before. With Wellesley, as with
Moore, private interests went down before National interests, and Duty
was a word utterly supreme through life.
Perhaps the main difference between the two lay in the fact that
Wellesley lacked that peculiar “strain of sweetness,” that element of
womanly tenderness, which made Moore to be so intensely beloved. His
was a more homogeneously iron nature; but it was of finely-wrought iron.
The meeting between Lord Castlereagh and Moore, with Moore’s impetuous
self-defence, was referred to. Sir John Moore gave full particulars of
what had passed, adding frankly:
“I thought it needful to express what I felt under the circumstances.
But, having done so, I have felt no more upon the subject.”
Wellesley demurred as to any such need. He feared much that, unless
some explanation took place, Sir John’s heat on that occasion might
stand in the road of his future usefulness to England. He was perfectly
sure that there had been no unkind intentions on the part of the
Ministers, since he had often heard them speak with high esteem of
Moore. Lord Castlereagh was naturally of a “cautious” temperament,
and there might have been some difficultly in giving the chief
command to Sir John, until a formal explanation had taken place with
the Swedish Court. Then Sir Arthur asked—might he be authorised to
say to the Ministers that Sir John was sorry to have been under a
misunderstanding, if indeed no slight had been meant by them; and that,
having once for all spoken out what he felt, he had now forgotten the
matter, and would think no more about it?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account