The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1012, May 20, 1899Various
General
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX. No. 1012, May 20, 1899
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
“Few and short were the prayers we said,
And we spoke not a word of sorrow,
But we steadfastly gazed on the face that was dead,
And we bitterly thought of the morrow.
We thought as we hollowed his narrow bed,
And smoothed down his lonely pillow,
That the foe and the stranger would tread o’er his head,
And we far away on the billow.
Lightly they’ll talk of the spirit that’s gone,
And o’er his cold ashes upbraid him;
But little he’ll reck, if they’ll let him sleep on,
In the grave where a Briton has laid him.
But half of our heavy task was done,
When the clock struck the hour for retiring,
And we heard the distant and random gun
That the foe was sullenly firing.
Slowly and sadly we laid him down,
From the field of his fame fresh and gory,
We carved not a line, and we raised not a stone,
But we left him alone with his glory.”[1]
For every man in the Army had lost a friend that day; and many a one
felt with passionate grief that the world, without John Moore in it,
would be for him a changed world thenceforward.
Hard things were spoken of him after he was gone, and upbraidings,
indeed, were uttered—_not_ by his brave foe, who honoured Moore,
and wished to raise a stone to his memory—but by an ungrateful
section of his own countrymen, because, forsooth, with an Army of
only twenty-three thousand men he had not met and crushed two hundred
thousand. We know better now! In the cold clear light of history, such
fogs are driven away.
Yet, even in these later days, have we made enough of the name of
John Moore? Have we thought enough of the man of whom Napoleon in the
zenith of his fame could declare that he was the only General left
fit to contend with himself, and against whose twenty-three thousand
men he counted it needful to bring in a fierce rush over eighty
thousand, failing even then in his purpose? Have we thought enough of
the man under whom the future Wellington wished nothing better than
to serve?—and about whose “towering fame” the sober historian of the
Peninsular War wrote in terms of unstinted praise? Have we thought
enough of the man who, while the bravest of the brave, was also the
most blameless and the most beloved of men, against whom Detraction had
no word to utter, save that he stood up almost too strenuously for his
country’s honour, and that he did not accomplish impossibilities?
If not, it is surely time that his countrymen should begin to “do him
justice!”
But for that fatal cannon-ball—who can say?—would Wellington have
become the foremost man in Europe, or would he have been second to
Moore? It might have been Moore, not Wellington, who turned the tide
of Napoleon’s success.[2] It was Moore who stemmed that tide, with his
spirited countermarch and splendid retreat, drawing the Enemy after
him, until he stood at bay upon the coast, and hurled back the onset of
the flower of Buonaparte’s Army.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account