The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX, No. 980, October 8, 1898 — John Shaqi
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX, No. 980, October 8, 1898Various
General
The Girl's Own Paper, Vol. XX, No. 980, October 8, 1898
Various
Children's literature -- Periodicals
MY DEAR DOROTHY.--You do not often favour me with your correspondence,
so that I was particularly pleased and flattered by the receipt of your
letter asking for my opinion, as a rising barrister, on the following
important legal points, which I will now proceed to deal with. As you
have approached me without the intervention of a solicitor, it may
possibly gratify you to know that I am not entitled to make any charge
(even were I disposed to do so) for my professional opinions. This
statement will, I am sure, remove a great weight from your mind; but a
truce to jesting, now to business.
In your first question you ask me to decide whether you or Mr.
Anstruther were right on the question of paying excess fares on your
return from the Crystal Palace the other evening.
So far as the arguments adduced on either side are concerned, I can
tell you frankly that you were both wrong; but let me have the facts of
the case clearly stated before me. It appears that Aunt Anne, Robert
and yourself went down last Wednesday to the Crystal Palace, where
you met Miss Anstruther and her brother; and I have no doubt enjoyed
yourselves immensely, wandering through those lovely grounds, gazing at
the antediluvian monsters on the lakes or listening to the bands in the
rosary or on the terrace.
In my opinion the Crystal Palace is just the place to spend a happy
day. This, however, is a digression.
Instead of dining at the Palace, Aunt Anne invited the Anstruthers to
return to town with you and to take their chance of getting--what I
from personal experience can vouch for as certain to have been--an
excellent impromptu meal.
On the return journey--we are getting to the point at last--the tickets
were collected at Battersea Bridge, your tickets were returns to
Victoria, but the Anstruthers had returns to Clapham Junction only, and
accordingly Mr. Anstruther was invited to pay excess fare on them.
As a matter of fact the price for a return ticket from Victoria to the
Palace is exactly the same as a return from Clapham Junction to the
Palace, and such being the case, you considered that the collector had
no right to demand an excess fare on Mr. Anstruther's tickets. You were
wrong. Mr. Anstruther, you say, paid the excess on the ground that it
was merely a concession on the part of the Company to those booking
at Victoria to charge them the same fare as those booking at Clapham
Junction; this may or may not be the case, it is beside the question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account