The glory of the PharaohsWeigall, Arthur E. P. Brome (Arthur Edward Pearse Brome)
History
The glory of the Pharaohs
Weigall, Arthur E. P. Brome (Arthur Edward Pearse Brome)
Egypt -- Antiquities
The excavator must be prepared to record everything he sees, and his
general knowledge must be such that he will not, by ignorance of what to
search for, overlook matters of this kind; for it is a patent fact that,
in general, we do not see what we do not look for. The number of tombs
in Egypt is limited, and the person who excavates any one of them has an
opportunity for observation which can never be exactly repeated. When he
has removed the antiquities to the museum he has necessarily obliterated
for ever the source of his information, and, unless the contents of the
tomb are all duly photographed and recorded _in situ_, that obliteration
is as calamitous as the actual destruction of the antiquities
themselves. He may carry off to his museum, let us say, four bronze
statuettes of no particular artistic merit or individuality. Their real
value to the scholar may have rested almost solely in the fact that they
stood at the four corners of the tomb to ward off the evil spirits of
the north, south, east, and west; and it is that piece of information
rather than the somewhat mediocre objects themselves which must at all
costs be preserved.
Thus the responsibility of the excavator is very great, and he must
honestly feel capable of meeting the demands which such work makes upon
him, and must enter upon his labours _in full consciousness of his
obligations to the public_. It may fall to his lot to dig through the
stratified remains of a Roman fortress in order to reach the ruins of an
Egyptian temple buried far below. To a large extent the Roman walls and
buildings must be destroyed, and scholars will afterwards possess only
so much information regarding the fortress as the excavator has had the
ability to record. If his notes are incomplete, then he may justly be
accused of destroying valuables which can never be replaced; and I can
see very little difference between him and the crazy villain who cuts a
slice out of a famous painting or smashes the nose off a statue. The
rarity of antiquities and ancient remains constitutes their special
value. Information once destroyed can never be recovered. A stroke of
the spade or pick, made before the necessary records are taken, may
nullify the labours of many an ancient Egyptian’s lifetime. An old
priest’s philosophy may have been summed up in the burial of a magical
figure of Osiris in the earth floor under his bed as a protection
against evil, and a too hasty stroke of the pick may lay bare the
statuette but at the same time obliterate the traces of the position of
the bed, thus rendering the magical little god as meaningless as the
thousands of others just like it which line our museum shelves. The
point of an arrow lying below the dust of a royal skeleton may be shown
by close observation to have been the cause of death, and a fact will
thus be added to history which might have been lost had a rough hand
scattered the ashes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account