Aztec mythology; Indian mythology -- Mexico; Mexico -- Religion
The evolution of a higher cultus is frequently identified with a more
intimate acquaintance with the heavenly bodies, but it is not generally
appreciated or understood by students of Comparative Religion that at
least two different kinds of conception underlie the general idea. A
luminary, sun, moon, or star, may be deified and achieve godhead by
reason of striking natural characteristics, or, on the other hand, it
may be identified with some god already known. Thus Mexican myth, as
related to Sahagun by the natives, asserted that the gods met at
Teotihuacan and told how two of their number, Nanahuatl and
Tecciztecatl, sacrificed themselves by leaping into a great fire,
becoming the sun and moon respectively. The remaining gods, sacrificing
themselves also, “conferred life upon the stars,” that is they became
identified with the several stellar constellations, becoming known as
the Centzon Mimixcoa and Centzon Uitznaua, or “Four hundred
Northerners” and “Four hundred Southerners,” as they occupied the sky
on its northern or southern side. [23]
Although this myth and a version of it current at Texcuco and given by
Mendieta in his Historia Ecclesiastica [24] both represent Nanahuatl as
the sun-god, he was not so known in Mexican popular religion and
priestly practice, and was indeed a form of the god Xolotl, a deity of
obscure characteristics. Tecciztecatl certainly was regarded as the
moon-god, but the solar luminary was known as Tonatiuh or
Piltzintecutli. As has already been stated, there are sound reasons for
the belief that the solar cult was a relatively late institution in
Mexico, although in some parts of the country it may have flourished
for generations before it became popular in Tenochtitlan. Slightly
elaborating our former reasons for this statement, we may indicate: (1)
The name Tonatiuh appears in the myths of the origin of the sun as that
of the luminary, but not of a god. (2) The circumstance that Tonatiuh
was regarded by the Mexicans as a “heaven,” a Valhalla, to which the
warriors slain in sacrifice betook themselves after death, and
therefore represented a place of reward, a class of myth which is
nearly always of comparatively late origin, and is the fruit of mature
speculation. (3) The fact that Tonatiuh was closely identified with the
warrior caste and therefore with human sacrifice, which was a late
introduction and the paramount reason for the existence of that caste.
(4) That the original Calendar was a lunar one. But these and other
considerations will be dealt with more fully when we undertake the
elucidation of the sun-god’s characteristics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account