Aztec mythology; Indian mythology -- Mexico; Mexico -- Religion
The interpreter of the Codex Vaticanus A says:
“Ytzlacoliuhqui signifies the lord of sin or of blindness, and for this
reason they paint him with his eyes bandaged. They say that he
committed sin in a place of the highest enjoyment and delight, and that
he remained naked; on which account his first sign is a lizard, which
is an animal of the ground naked and miserable. He presided over these
thirteen signs, which were all unlucky. They said likewise that if
false evidence should be adduced on any one of these signs it would be
impossible to make the truth manifest. They put to death those who were
taken in adultery before his image if the parties were married; as this
not being the case, it was lawful for them to keep as many women or
concubines as they pleased. Ytzalcoliuhqui is a star in heaven which as
they pretend proceeds in a reverse course; they considered it a most
portentous sign, both as concerned with nativities and war. This star
is situated at the south.”
The interpreter of the Codex Telleriano-Remensis says:
“Ytzlacoliuhqui, the lord of sin. Ytzlacoliuhqui was the lord of these
thirteen days. They say he was the god of frost. They put to death
before his image those who were convicted of adultery during these
thirteen days; this was the punishment of married persons both men and
women, for, provided the parties were unmarried, the men were at
liberty to keep as many concubines as they pleased.
“Ytzlacoliuhqui was the lord of sin or of blindness, who committed sin
in paradise; they therefore represented him with his eyes bandaged, and
his day was accordingly the lizard and, like the lizard, he is naked.
He is a star in heaven which ... proceeds in a backward course with its
eyes bandaged. They considered it a great prognostic.
“All these thirteen days were bad, for they affirmed that if evidence
should be adduced in these days it would be impossible to arrive at
justice, but they imagined that justice would be perverted in such a
manner that unjust condemnations would ensue, which was not the case in
the days immediately following, when if evidence was adduced they
supposed that justice would be made apparent. They believed that those
who were born on the sign dedicated to him would be sinners and
adulterers.”
NATURE AND STATUS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account