Aztec mythology; Indian mythology -- Mexico; Mexico -- Religion
The religious customs of those peoples who were relatively aboriginal
to the Nahua support the theory of the predominance of the rain-cult in
Mexico from a very early period, and Torquemada states that during
seasons of drought the Otomi sought to propitiate the rain-gods by
sacrificing a virgin on the top of a hill. [29] Espinosa says that the
Tarascans sacrificed snakes rather than human beings—possibly for the
same reason as the Esquimaux beat their dogs during an eclipse, in
order that the Great Dog which causes the undesirable phenomenon may
desist, the Tarascans probably killing the reptiles in question in
order that the Great Snake might relent and send rain. [30] The towns
about Chapala paid divine honours to the spirit of the adjacent lake.
Late though these survivals may have been at the era of the Conquest,
yet they seem to have enshrined the memory of an early rain-cult among
the peoples with whom they were found, and many others could be
adduced.
THE QUETZALCOATL CULT
The appearance of the Quetzalcoatl cult in Mexico, which would seem to
have entered the country at some time about the middle of the eighth
century, must have caused very considerable alterations in the simple
and probably as yet uninfluenced rain religion which it found in
occupancy. From whatever portion of the Isthmian tract it came, one
thing regarding it is positively certain—that it introduced into Mexico
the rudiments of the calendric computation evolved in Central America.
In its phase as imported by the apostles of the Quetzalcoatl religion,
it seems fairly certain that the tonalamatl was of the nature of a
lunar time-count, and the probabilities are that its protagonists
discovered on their arrival in Anahuac that a count similar in
character was in use among the priesthood of the Tlaloc worshippers,
who as an agricultural people could hardly have been without some such
system of computation. The Quetzalcoatl faith, however, was manifestly
of a considerably higher status than that which it encountered, as is
obvious not only by the numerous and extraordinary traditions regarding
the Toltec civilization, but the actual remains it has left. It is
clear that, whether it found a calendar or time-count already existing,
it placated aboriginal opinion by the amalgamation of the several
festivals of the rain-god with its own. The fact that the day-signs of
the Mexican calendar or tonalamatl are almost identical with those of
the Maya tonalamatl is good proof that the former was developed from
the latter; and if only a small proportion of Toltec deities find a
place in its monthly festivals, that would seem to be due to the
circumstance that later Nahua demands for the inclusion of their tribal
deities were acceded to. We may, perhaps, imagine the early tonalamatl
of the Quetzalcoatl missionaries to have been similar in form to that
of the Maya—that is, it must have been almost wholly concerned with the
festivals of deities of a purely agricultural kind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account