951 Diodorus, iii. 59; Firmicus Maternus, _De err. profan. relig._ 3; Arnobius, _Advers. nat._ v. 16; Schol. on Nicander, _Alex._ 8; Servius on Virgil, _Aen._ ix. 116; Arrian, _Tactica_, 33. The ceremony described in Firmicus Maternus, c. 22 (_nocte quadam simulacrum in lectica supinum ponitur et per numeros digestis fletibus plangitur.... Idolum sepelis. Idolum plangis_, etc.), may very well be the mourning and funeral rites of Attis, to which he had more briefly referred in c. 3. 952 On the _Hilaria_ see Macrobius, _Saturn._ i. 21, 10; Julian, _Orat._ v. 168 D, 169 D; Damascius, _Vita Isidori_, in Photius, p. 345 A 5 _sqq._ ed. Bekker. On the resurrection, see Firmicus Maternus, 3, _reginae suae amorem [Phryges] cum luctibus annuis consecrarunt, et ut satis iratae mulieri facerent aut ut paenitenti solacium quaererent, quem paulo ante sepelierant revixisse jactarunt.... Mortem ipsius_ [_i.e._ of Attis] _dicunt, quod semina collecta conduntur, vitam rursus quod jacta semina annuis vicibus † reconduntur_ [_renascuntur_, C. Halm]. Again cp. id. 22, _Idolum sepelis_. _Idolum plangis, idolum de sepultura proferis, et miser cum haec feceris gaudes_; and Damascius, _l.c._ τὴν τῶν ἱλαρίων καλουμένην ἐορτήν; ὅπερ ἑδήλου τὴν ἑξ ἄδου γεγονυῖαν ἡμῶν σωτερίαν. This last passage, compared with the formula in Firmicus Maternus, c. 22 θαρρεῖτε μύσται τοῦ θεοῦ σεσωμένου; ἔσται γὰρ ἠμῖν ἐκ πόνων σωτηρία, makes it probable that the ceremony described by Firmicus, c. 22, is the resurrection of Attis. 953 Ovid, _Fast._ iv. 337 _sqq._; Ammianus Marcellinus, xxiii. 3. For other references see Marquardt and Mannhardt, _ll. cc._ 954 Pausanias, vii. 17; Arnobius, _Adv. nationes_, v. 6.; cp. Hippolytus, _Refut. omn. haeres._ v. 9, pp. 166, 168. 955 See above, p. 264 _sq._ 956 Firmicus Maternus, 27. 957 Above, p. 81. 958 Hippolytus, _Ref. omn. haeres._ v. cc. 8, 9, pp. 162, 168; Firmicus Maternus, _De errore prof. relig._ 3. 959 Julian, _Orat._ v. 174 A B. 960 Duncker, _Geschichte des Alterthums_,5 i. 456, _note_ 4; Roscher, _Ausführliches Lexikon d. griech. u. röm. Mythologie_, i. c. 724. Cp. Polybius, xxii. 20 (18). 961 The conjecture is that of Henzen in _Annal. d. Inst._ 1856, p. 110, referred to in Roscher, _l.c._ 962 See pp. 84, 231. 963 Article “Phrygia,” in _Encyclopaedia Britannica_, ninth ed. xviii. 853. 964 xii. 5, 3. 965 The myth, in a connected form, is only known from Plutarch, _Isis et Osiris_, cc. 13-19. Some additional details, recovered from Egyptian sources, will be found in the work of Adolf Erman, _Aegypten und aegyptisches Leben im Altertum_, p. 365 _sqq._