The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 03 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 03 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
(M204) It might naturally be expected that the reserve so commonly
maintained with regard to personal names would be dropped or at least
relaxed among relations and friends. But the reverse of this is often the
case. It is precisely the persons most intimately connected by blood and
especially by marriage to whom the rule applies with the greatest
stringency. Such people are often forbidden, not only to pronounce each
other’s names, but even to utter ordinary words which resemble or have a
single syllable in common with these names. The persons who are thus
mutually debarred from mentioning each other’s names are especially
husbands and wives, a man and his wife’s parents, and a woman and her
husband’s father. For example, among the Caffres of South Africa a woman
may not publicly pronounce the birth-name of her husband or of any of his
brothers, nor may she use the interdicted word in its ordinary sense. If
her husband, for instance, be called u-Mpaka, from _impaka_, a small
feline animal, she must speak of that beast by some other name.(1259)
Further, a Caffre wife is forbidden to pronounce even mentally the names
of her father-in-law and of all her husband’s male relations in the
ascending line; and whenever the emphatic syllable of any of their names
occurs in another word, she must avoid it by substituting either an
entirely new word, or, at least, another syllable in its place. Hence this
custom has given rise to an almost distinct language among the women,
which the Caffres call _Ukuteta Kwabafazi_ or “women’s speech.”(1260) The
interpretation of this “women’s speech” is naturally very difficult, “for
no definite rules can be given for the formation of these substituted
words, nor is it possible to form a dictionary of them, their number being
so great—since there may be many women, even in the same tribe, who would
be no more at liberty to use the substitutes employed by some others, than
they are to use the original words themselves.”(1261) A Caffre man, on his
side, may not mention the name of his mother-in-law, nor may she pronounce
his; but he is free to utter words in which the emphatic syllable of her
name occurs.(1262) In Northern Nyassaland no woman will speak the name of
her husband or even use a word that may be synonymous with it. If she were
to call him by his proper name, she believes it would be unlucky and would
affect her powers of conception. In like manner women abstain, for
superstitious reasons, from using the common names of articles of food,
which they designate by terms peculiar to themselves.(1263) Among the
Kondes, at the north-western end of Lake Nyassa, a woman may not mention
the name of her father-in-law; indeed she may not even speak to him nor
see him.(1264) Among the Barea and Bogos of Eastern Africa a woman never
mentions her husband’s name; a Bogo wife would rather be unfaithful to him
than commit the monstrous sin of allowing his name to pass her lips.(1265)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account