The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 03 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 03 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
entertained a rooted aversion to salt, so that whenever the thing was
carried past the lake in which he resided it had to be called by another
name, or it would all have been dissolved and lost. The persons whom he
inspired had to veil their references to the obnoxious article under the
disguise of “sweet peppers.”(1496) In a West African story we read of a
man who was told that he would die if ever the word for salt was
pronounced in his hearing. The fatal word was pronounced, and die he did
sure enough, but he soon came to life again with the help of a magical
wooden pestle of which he was the lucky possessor.(1497)
(M245) In India the animals whose names are most commonly tabooed are the
snake and the tiger, but the same tribute of respect is paid to other
beasts also. Sayids and Mussulmans of high rank in northern India say that
you should never call a snake by its proper name, but always describe it
either as a tiger (_sher_) or a string (_rassi_).(1498) In Telingana the
euphemistic name for a snake, which should always be employed, is worm or
insect (_purugu_); if you call a cobra by its proper name, the creature
will haunt you for seven years and bite you at the first
opportunity.(1499) Ignorant Bengalee women will not mention a snake or a
thief by their proper names at night, for fear that one or other might
appear. When they have to allude to a serpent, they call it “the creeping
thing”; when they speak of a thief, they say “the unwelcome
visitor.”(1500) Other euphemisms for the snake in northern India are
“maternal uncle” and “rope.” They say that if a snake bites you, you
should not mention its name, but merely observe “A rope has touched
me.”(1501) Natives of Travancore are careful not to speak disrespectfully
of serpents. A cobra is called “the good lord” (_nalla tambiran_) or “the
good snake” (_nalla pambu_). While the Malayalies of the Shervaray Hills
are hunting the tiger, they speak of the beast only as “the dog.”(1502)
The Canarese of southern India call the tiger either “the dog” or “the
jackal”; they think that if they called him by his proper name, he would
be sure to carry off one of them.(1503) The jungle people of northern
India, who meet the tiger in his native haunts, will not pronounce his
name, but speak of him as “the jackal” (_gídar_), or “the beast”
(_janwar_), or use some other euphemistic term. In some places they treat
the wolf and the bear in the same fashion.(1504) The Pankas of South
Mirzapur will not name the tiger, bear, camel, or donkey by their proper
names; the camel they call “long neck.” Other tribes of the same district
only scruple to mention certain animals in the morning. Thus, the
Kharwars, a Dravidian tribe, will not name a pig, squirrel, hare, jackal,
bear, monkey, or donkey in the morning hours; if they have to allude to
these animals at that time, they call them by special names. For instance,
they call the hare “the four-footed one” or “he that hides in the rocks”;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account