The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 08 of 12) — John Shaqi
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 08 of 12)Frazer, James George
Religion
The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion (Third Edition, Vol. 08 of 12)
Frazer, James George
Magic; Mythology; Religion; Superstition
(M25) In the light of these parallels the beliefs and customs of the
Egyptians touching the pig are probably to be explained as based upon an
opinion of the extreme sanctity rather than of the extreme uncleanness of
the animal; or rather, to put it more correctly, they imply that the
animal was looked on, not simply as a filthy and disgusting creature, but
as a being endowed with high supernatural powers, and that as such it was
regarded with that primitive sentiment of religious awe and fear in which
the feelings of reverence and abhorrence are almost equally blended. The
ancients themselves seem to have been aware that there was another side to
the horror with which swine seemed to inspire the Egyptians. For the Greek
astronomer and mathematician Eudoxus, who resided fourteen months in Egypt
and conversed with the priests,(116) was of opinion that the Egyptians
spared the pig, not out of abhorrence, but from a regard to its utility in
agriculture; for, according to him, when the Nile had subsided, herds of
swine were turned loose over the fields to tread the seed down into the
moist earth.(117) But when a being is thus the object of mixed and
implicitly contradictory feelings, he may be said to occupy a position of
unstable equilibrium. In course of time one of the contradictory feelings
is likely to prevail over the other, and according as the feeling which
finally predominates is that of reverence or abhorrence, the being who is
the object of it will rise into a god or sink into a devil. The latter, on
the whole, was the fate of the pig in Egypt. For in historical times the
fear and horror of the pig seem certainly to have outweighed the reverence
and worship of which he may once have been the object, and of which, even
in his fallen state, he never quite lost trace. He came to be looked on as
an embodiment of Set or Typhon, the Egyptian devil and enemy of Osiris.
For it was in the shape of a black pig that Typhon injured the eye of the
god Horus, who burned him and instituted the sacrifice of the pig, the
sun-god Ra having declared the beast abominable.(118) Again, the story
that Typhon was hunting a boar when he discovered and mangled the body of
Osiris, and that this was the reason why pigs were sacrificed once a
year,(119) is clearly a modernised version of an older story that Osiris,
like Adonis and Attis, was slain or mangled by a boar, or by Typhon in the
form of a boar. Thus, the annual sacrifice of a pig to Osiris might
naturally be interpreted as vengeance inflicted on the hostile animal that
had slain or mangled the god. But, in the first place, when an animal is
thus killed as a solemn sacrifice once and once only in the year, it
generally or always means that the animal is divine, that he is spared and
respected the rest of the year as a god and slain, when he is slain, also
in the character of a god.(120) In the second place, the examples of
Dionysus and Demeter, if not of Attis and Adonis, have taught us that the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account