[294] _Evang. de S. Math._, ch. 22. [295] _Zend-Avesta_, 30ᵉ _hâ_, p. 164; _ibid._, 34ᵉ _hâ_, p. 174; _ibid._, 72ᵉ _hâ_, p. 258. [296] _Vie de Confucius_, p. 139. [297] Herm. Trismeg., _In Pœmand._ [298] Senac., _De Sen._, vi., 2. [299] Aul. Gell., l. vi., c. 2. [300] Plutar., _De repugn. Stoïc. de Fato._ [301] Chalcidius, _in Tim._, not. 295, p. 387. [302] _Hist. du Manich._, t. ii., l. v., ch. 6, p. 250. [303] _Dict. crit._, MANICHEENS, rem. D. [304] Cicéron, _Tuscul._, l. i.; Clem. Alex., _Strom._, l. v., p. 501. [305] Justin., _Cohort ad Gent._, p. 6; Cyrill., _Contr. Julien_; Fabric., _Bibl. græc._, t. i., p. 472. [306] Plutar., _De Procr. anim._ [307] Plat., _Epist._, 2 et 7, t. iii., p. 312, 313, 341, etc. [308] _Voyez_ l’excellent ouvrage de Beausobre à ce sujet, _L’Histoire du Manichéisme_. [309] When Zoroaster spoke of this Cause, he gave it the name of _Time without Limit_, following the translation of Anquetil Duperron. This Cause does not still appear absolute in the doctrine of this theosophist; because in a passage of the _Zend-Avesta_, where in contemplation of the Supreme Being, producer of Ormuzd, he calls this Being, _the Being absorbed in excellence_, and says that Fire, acting from the beginning, is the principle of union between this Being and Ormuzd (36ᵉ _hâ du Vendidad Sadé_, p. 180, 19ᵉ _fargard_, p. 415). One finds in another book, called _Sharistha_, that when this Supreme Being organized the matter of the Universe, he projected his Will in the form of a resplendent light (_Apud_ Hyde, c. 22, p. 298). [310] _In Tim._, not. 295. [311] _Voyez_ Photius, _Cod._, 251. Plotin, Porphyre, Jamblique, Proclus et Symplicius ont été du même sentiment qu’ Hiéroclès, ainsi que le dit le savant Fabricius, _Bibl. græc._, t. i., p. 472. [312] _Iliad, L. ult._, v. 663. [313] Cicér., _de Natur. Deor._, l. i., c. 15. [314] Cicér., _de Fato_, c. 17. [315] _Axiômes de Pythagore conservés par Stobée_, Serm. 6. [316] Hiérocl., _Aur. carm._, v. 10 et 11. [317] Strab., 1. xvi., p. 512; Sext. Empir., _Adv. Mathem._, p. 367. [318] _Atom_, in Greek ἄτομος, is formed from the word τόμος, _a part_, to which is joined the _a_ privative. [319] Huet, _Cens. Phil. Cartesian._, c. 8, p. 213. If one carefully examines the systems of Descartes, Leibnitz, and Newton, one will see that, after all, they are reduced either to atoms, or to inherent forces which move them. [320] Cicér., _de Fato_, c. 17. [321] August., _Epist._, 56. [322] August., _Epist._, 56. [323] Cicér., _de Nat. Deor._, l. i., c. 19; _Quæst. Acad._, l. iv., c. 13; _de Fato_, c. 9. [324] Diog. Laërt., l. x., §123; Cicér., _de Nat. Deor._, l. i., c. 30.